Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[ISSUE #1430] Add TopicMessageQueueChangeListener trait for client #1431

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 29, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1430

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new module for listening to changes in message queues associated with specific topics.
    • Added a trait for handling message queue changes, allowing for efficient updates when message queues are modified.
  • Documentation

    • Included licensing information for compliance with the Apache License, Version 2.0.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce a new public module, topic_message_queue_change_listener, in the rocketmq-client/src/consumer.rs file. A new Rust file, topic_message_queue_change_listener.rs, is created, which defines a trait named TopicMessageQueueChangeListener. This trait includes a method on_changed for handling changes in message queues associated with a specific topic. The implementation ensures thread safety by requiring the trait to be Send and Sync.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-client/src/consumer.rs Added new public module: pub mod topic_message_queue_change_listener;
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/topic_message_queue_change_listener.rs Added trait: pub trait TopicMessageQueueChangeListener with method fn on_changed(&self, topic: &str, message_queues: HashSet<MessageQueue>)

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add TopicMessageQueueChangeListener trait for client (#1430)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature, auto merge, approved, ready to review, waiting-review

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

🐰 In the land of code where changes bloom,
A trait was born to dispel the gloom.
With queues that shift and messages that sway,
The listener hops in to save the day!
So let’s celebrate this new delight,
In the world of Rust, everything feels right! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Nov 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/topic_message_queue_change_listener.rs (1)

23-30: Consider enhancing the documentation with additional details.

While the current documentation is good, it could be more comprehensive. Consider adding:

  • Thread safety guarantees and expectations
  • Whether the callback is expected to be synchronous or asynchronous
  • Whether implementations should be idempotent
  • Potential scenarios when this callback might be invoked

Here's a suggested documentation enhancement:

 /// A trait for listening to changes in the message queues of a specific topic.
+/// 
+/// This trait is thread-safe (`Send + Sync`) and implementations should be prepared
+/// to handle concurrent invocations. The callback is expected to be non-blocking
+/// and should handle message queue changes idempotently.
+///
+/// # Thread Safety
+/// 
+/// The trait requires `Send + Sync` bounds to ensure thread-safe usage across
+/// multiple consumer threads. Implementations should be careful about shared state
+/// access and potential deadlocks.
+///
+/// # Callback Behavior
+///
+/// The `on_changed` method may be called in the following scenarios:
+/// - Initial topic subscription
+/// - Broker cluster topology changes
+/// - Topic queue scaling operations
 ///
 /// # Arguments
 ///
 /// * `topic` - The name of the topic whose message queues have changed.
 /// * `message_queues` - A set of `MessageQueue` instances representing the new state of the
-///   message queues.
+///   message queues. This set represents the complete state, not just the changes.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 964f1eb and 9519194.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/topic_message_queue_change_listener.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer.rs (1)

33-33: LGTM! Module declaration follows established patterns.

The new public module declaration follows the existing pattern and naming conventions, appropriately grouped with other listener-related modules.

Let's verify how this new listener integrates with existing listener modules:

✅ Verification successful

LGTM! The new listener trait follows established patterns and integrates well with existing listener architecture.

The verification shows that:

  • The new TopicMessageQueueChangeListener trait follows the same thread-safety bounds (Send + Sync) as other listeners
  • It has a similar method signature pattern to the existing MessageQueueListener trait
  • The implementation is properly placed alongside other message queue related listeners in the consumer module
  • The trait's API is well-documented with clear purpose and parameters
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential integration points and similar listener patterns

# Check for other listener implementations and patterns
echo "Checking for other listener implementations:"
rg -A 5 "trait.*Listener" 

# Check for usage patterns of existing listeners
echo "Checking for listener usage patterns:"
ast-grep --pattern 'impl $_ for $_ {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 102801


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the new listener trait and its integration points

# Check the implementation of the new listener trait
echo "Checking the TopicMessageQueueChangeListener trait implementation:"
rg -A 10 "TopicMessageQueueChangeListener" rocketmq-client/src/consumer/topic_message_queue_change_listener.rs

# Check for potential usage/integration points
echo "Checking for usage of the new listener:"
rg -A 5 "TopicMessageQueueChangeListener" --type rust

# Check for similar message queue related listener patterns
echo "Checking for similar message queue listener patterns:"
rg -A 5 "MessageQueue.*Listener" --type rust

Length of output: 7229

rocketmq-client/src/consumer/topic_message_queue_change_listener.rs (3)

17-19: LGTM! Clean and minimal imports.

The imports are appropriate and well-organized, using only what's necessary for the implementation.


21-22: LGTM! Well-designed trait with appropriate thread safety bounds.

The trait is properly designed with Send + Sync bounds, making it safe to use in a concurrent context, which is crucial for a message queue system.


30-30: Verify consistency with RocketMQ Java client implementation.

The method signature takes ownership of the HashSet<MessageQueue>. Let's verify if this matches the behavior in the Java client and if it's the most efficient approach.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the implementation details.


Based on the comprehensive code analysis, I can now provide the final response:

The current implementation using owned HashSet<MessageQueue> is correct and consistent with the codebase design

The implementation is well-aligned with the codebase patterns for several reasons:

  • The MessageQueueListener trait uses borrowed &HashSet<MessageQueue> for its callback, while TopicMessageQueueChangeListener takes ownership, showing an intentional design difference
  • The owned HashSet<MessageQueue> pattern is consistently used throughout the codebase when representing a new state or result set (e.g., in LockBatchResponseBody, get_working_message_queue)
  • Taking ownership is appropriate here as this represents a new state of message queues that the listener might need to store or process further
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how the Java client implements this listener to ensure consistency

# Search for the Java implementation of TopicMessageQueueChangeListener
rg -t java "TopicMessageQueueChangeListener|onChanged.*MessageQueue" 

# Search for similar patterns in other Rust message queue clients for best practices
rg -t rust "MessageQueue.*Listener|queue.*change.*callback" 

Length of output: 1468


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of both listener traits and their usage
ast-grep --pattern 'trait MessageQueueListener {
  $$$
}'

ast-grep --pattern 'trait TopicMessageQueueChangeListener {
  $$$
}'

# Check how these listeners are used in the codebase
rg -A 5 "impl.*MessageQueueListener"
rg -A 5 "impl.*TopicMessageQueueChangeListener"

Length of output: 219


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of these files
cat rocketmq-client/src/consumer/topic_message_queue_change_listener.rs
cat rocketmq-client/src/consumer/message_queue_listener.rs

# Also check where HashSet<MessageQueue> is used in similar contexts
rg -B 2 -A 2 "HashSet<MessageQueue>"

Length of output: 20488

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Add TopicMessageQueueChangeListener trait for client
4 participants