-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
[ISSUE #1430] Add TopicMessageQueueChangeListener trait for client #1431
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new public module, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/topic_message_queue_change_listener.rs (1)
23-30
: Consider enhancing the documentation with additional details.While the current documentation is good, it could be more comprehensive. Consider adding:
- Thread safety guarantees and expectations
- Whether the callback is expected to be synchronous or asynchronous
- Whether implementations should be idempotent
- Potential scenarios when this callback might be invoked
Here's a suggested documentation enhancement:
/// A trait for listening to changes in the message queues of a specific topic. +/// +/// This trait is thread-safe (`Send + Sync`) and implementations should be prepared +/// to handle concurrent invocations. The callback is expected to be non-blocking +/// and should handle message queue changes idempotently. +/// +/// # Thread Safety +/// +/// The trait requires `Send + Sync` bounds to ensure thread-safe usage across +/// multiple consumer threads. Implementations should be careful about shared state +/// access and potential deadlocks. +/// +/// # Callback Behavior +/// +/// The `on_changed` method may be called in the following scenarios: +/// - Initial topic subscription +/// - Broker cluster topology changes +/// - Topic queue scaling operations /// /// # Arguments /// /// * `topic` - The name of the topic whose message queues have changed. /// * `message_queues` - A set of `MessageQueue` instances representing the new state of the -/// message queues. +/// message queues. This set represents the complete state, not just the changes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer.rs
(1 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/topic_message_queue_change_listener.rs
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer.rs (1)
33-33
: LGTM! Module declaration follows established patterns.
The new public module declaration follows the existing pattern and naming conventions, appropriately grouped with other listener-related modules.
Let's verify how this new listener integrates with existing listener modules:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The new listener trait follows established patterns and integrates well with existing listener architecture.
The verification shows that:
- The new
TopicMessageQueueChangeListener
trait follows the same thread-safety bounds (Send + Sync
) as other listeners - It has a similar method signature pattern to the existing
MessageQueueListener
trait - The implementation is properly placed alongside other message queue related listeners in the consumer module
- The trait's API is well-documented with clear purpose and parameters
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential integration points and similar listener patterns
# Check for other listener implementations and patterns
echo "Checking for other listener implementations:"
rg -A 5 "trait.*Listener"
# Check for usage patterns of existing listeners
echo "Checking for listener usage patterns:"
ast-grep --pattern 'impl $_ for $_ {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 102801
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the new listener trait and its integration points
# Check the implementation of the new listener trait
echo "Checking the TopicMessageQueueChangeListener trait implementation:"
rg -A 10 "TopicMessageQueueChangeListener" rocketmq-client/src/consumer/topic_message_queue_change_listener.rs
# Check for potential usage/integration points
echo "Checking for usage of the new listener:"
rg -A 5 "TopicMessageQueueChangeListener" --type rust
# Check for similar message queue related listener patterns
echo "Checking for similar message queue listener patterns:"
rg -A 5 "MessageQueue.*Listener" --type rust
Length of output: 7229
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/topic_message_queue_change_listener.rs (3)
17-19
: LGTM! Clean and minimal imports.
The imports are appropriate and well-organized, using only what's necessary for the implementation.
21-22
: LGTM! Well-designed trait with appropriate thread safety bounds.
The trait is properly designed with Send + Sync
bounds, making it safe to use in a concurrent context, which is crucial for a message queue system.
30-30
: Verify consistency with RocketMQ Java client implementation.
The method signature takes ownership of the HashSet<MessageQueue>
. Let's verify if this matches the behavior in the Java client and if it's the most efficient approach.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the implementation details.
Based on the comprehensive code analysis, I can now provide the final response:
The current implementation using owned HashSet<MessageQueue>
is correct and consistent with the codebase design
The implementation is well-aligned with the codebase patterns for several reasons:
- The
MessageQueueListener
trait uses borrowed&HashSet<MessageQueue>
for its callback, whileTopicMessageQueueChangeListener
takes ownership, showing an intentional design difference - The owned
HashSet<MessageQueue>
pattern is consistently used throughout the codebase when representing a new state or result set (e.g., inLockBatchResponseBody
,get_working_message_queue
) - Taking ownership is appropriate here as this represents a new state of message queues that the listener might need to store or process further
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how the Java client implements this listener to ensure consistency
# Search for the Java implementation of TopicMessageQueueChangeListener
rg -t java "TopicMessageQueueChangeListener|onChanged.*MessageQueue"
# Search for similar patterns in other Rust message queue clients for best practices
rg -t rust "MessageQueue.*Listener|queue.*change.*callback"
Length of output: 1468
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of both listener traits and their usage
ast-grep --pattern 'trait MessageQueueListener {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'trait TopicMessageQueueChangeListener {
$$$
}'
# Check how these listeners are used in the codebase
rg -A 5 "impl.*MessageQueueListener"
rg -A 5 "impl.*TopicMessageQueueChangeListener"
Length of output: 219
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of these files
cat rocketmq-client/src/consumer/topic_message_queue_change_listener.rs
cat rocketmq-client/src/consumer/message_queue_listener.rs
# Also check where HashSet<MessageQueue> is used in similar contexts
rg -B 2 -A 2 "HashSet<MessageQueue>"
Length of output: 20488
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1430
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation