Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[ISSUE #1450]🔨Update refactor.yml #1451

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

SpaceXCN
Copy link
Collaborator

@SpaceXCN SpaceXCN commented Nov 29, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1450

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new licensing section for clarity on usage rights.
    • Added a description field to enhance template purpose.
    • Defined labels for better categorization of issues.
  • Improvements

    • Expanded the issue template with detailed prompts to guide users in providing comprehensive information about code refactors.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/refactor.yml file. A new licensing section has been added, and the structure of the issue template has been modified. The about field has been removed, and a description field has been introduced. The template now includes several textarea fields for detailed user input regarding the refactor, and the labels field has been explicitly defined.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/refactor.yml Added licensing section, removed about field, added description and labels fields, expanded body with textarea fields for detailed input.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update refactor.yml (1450)

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, auto merge, documentation, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • mxsm

Poem

In the garden of code, we make a new start,
With templates refined, we craft from the heart.
A section for licenses, clear paths to explore,
Each refactor we guide, with prompts to implore.
Hop along, dear coder, let clarity bloom,
In the fields of our repo, there's always more room! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Nov 29, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@SpaceXCN 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/refactor.yml (1)

Line range hint 22-89: Consider enhancing the template with additional safeguards

The template structure is comprehensive, but consider these improvements for better risk management:

  1. Make critical checklist items required:

    • "Ensure the refactor does not introduce new bugs"
    • "Update unit tests if applicable"
  2. Add a new section for risk assessment:

    • Potential risks of the refactor
    • Rollback plan if issues arise
    • Impact on dependent systems

Here's a suggested addition to include after the existing checkboxes:

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: "Risk Assessment"
      description: "Describe potential risks and mitigation strategies"
      placeholder: |
        - Potential risks:
        - Rollback plan:
        - Impact on dependent systems:
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n

(new-lines)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ddcea21 and 040f3ad.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/refactor.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/refactor.yml

[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n

(new-lines)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/refactor.yml (2)

18-20: LGTM! Well-structured template metadata

The metadata section is well-organized with appropriate title formatting and label configuration.


Line range hint 1-89: Verify template compatibility with existing issues

Let's ensure the template changes don't break existing refactor issues.

✅ Verification successful

No existing refactor issues found - template changes are safe to proceed

The verification shows there are no existing issues with the 'refactor' label, indicating this is a new template being introduced. Therefore, there are no backward compatibility concerns to address.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing refactor issues and their structure
gh issue list --label refactor --json title,body,labels --limit 10

Length of output: 71

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n

(new-lines)

Comment on lines +1 to +16
#
# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
# contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
# this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
# The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
# (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
# the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
#
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix line endings in the file

The file contains incorrect line endings. Please ensure all line endings are Unix-style (\n).

You can fix this by running:

dos2unix .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/refactor.yml
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n

(new-lines)

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 4c23baf into mxsm:main Nov 29, 2024
20 of 23 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Nov 29, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge enhancement⚡️ New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️]Update refactor.yml
4 participants