[ISSUE #1471]🔥Clean test cases compile warning🚀

[mxsm]

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1471

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

• New Features

  • Enhanced error handling for request sending, improving reliability.
  • Introduced setter methods for local_address, remote_address, and channel_id in the Channel struct for better state management.
  • Added support for a new topic_queue_mapping_info_map in the RegisterBrokerBody struct, enhancing topic management functionality.

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved timeout and response failure management in the send_wait_response method.

• Chores

  • Cleaned up test code by renaming unused variables to suppress warnings.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several enhancements to the Channel struct and its methods in the rocketmq-remoting/src/net/channel.rs file, focusing on improved error handling during request sending. Additionally, setter methods for various fields have been added. The RegisterBrokerBody struct in rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/broker_body/register_broker_body.rs has been updated to support a new field for topic queue mappings, enhancing its encoding and decoding capabilities. Minor changes were made to test variable names in rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/cluster_acl_version_info.rs to suppress warnings.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/net/channel.rs	Updated run_send for better error handling; added setter methods for local_address, remote_address, and channel_id.
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/broker_body/register_broker_body.rs	Added encoding/decoding logic for new field topic_queue_mapping_info_map in RegisterBrokerBody.
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/cluster_acl_version_info.rs	Renamed test variables info1 and info2 to _info1 and _info2 to suppress unused variable warnings.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Clean test cases compile warning (#1471)	✅

Possibly related PRs

• [ISSUE #750]✨Add client meta data struct #758: The changes in the Channel struct and its methods may relate to the MessageQueue struct modifications, as both involve handling communication and state management in the RocketMQ system.
• [ISSUE #1258]🚀Implement RegisterBrokerBody compress encode and decode #1260: The updates to the RegisterBrokerBody struct's encoding and decoding methods are directly related to the changes in the Channel struct, as both involve handling network communication and data serialization.
• [ISSUE #1265]🐛Fix RegisterBrokerBody decode error #1266: The fixes to the RegisterBrokerBody decoding errors are relevant as they also deal with the encoding and decoding processes, which are crucial for the communication handled by the Channel struct.
• [ISSUE #1452]🔥Refactor rocketmq-remoting crate error handle🚨 #1455: The refactor of error handling in the rocketmq-remoting crate, including changes to how errors are represented and managed, is related to the error handling improvements made in the Channel struct's methods.
• [ISSUE #1456]🔥Refactor rocketmq-broker crate error handle🚨 #1457: The refactor of error handling in the rocketmq-broker crate, particularly the changes to the BrokerError enum, may connect to the overall error management strategy that could impact how errors are handled in the Channel struct.

Suggested labels

bug, ready to review, waiting-review

Suggested reviewers

• TeslaRustor
• SpaceXCN

Poem

In the channels where data flows,
Errors once hid, now brightly show.
With setters new, and maps to share,
Our code now dances, light as air!
🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e3db91 and 0ff224a.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• rocketmq-remoting/src/net/channel.rs (0 hunks)
• rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/broker_body/register_broker_body.rs (0 hunks)
• rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/cluster_acl_version_info.rs (2 hunks)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[rocketmq-rust-bot]

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.34%. Comparing base (2e3db91) to head (0ff224a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1472   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   22.34%   22.34%           
=======================================
  Files         450      450           
  Lines       58066    58066           
=======================================
  Hits        12974    12974           
  Misses      45092    45092           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.