Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[ISSUE #1489]📝Update rocketmq-macros README.md #1490

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Dec 2, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1489

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the README title for clarity.
    • Revised introduction to focus on macros in RocketMQ-Rust.
    • Added a section outlining currently defined macros, including RequestHeaderCodec and RemotingSerializable.
    • Provided a detailed description and example usage for the RequestHeaderCodec macro, highlighting its role in serialization and required fields.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the README.md file for the RocketMQ Rust implementation. The title has been revised for conciseness, and the introduction now emphasizes the primary focus on macros. A new section details the defined macros, particularly RequestHeaderCodec and RemotingSerializable, with an added description of the RequestHeaderCodec macro, its attributes, and an example usage. These modifications aim to enhance clarity and usability of the documentation.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-macros/README.md Updated title, revised introduction, added section on defined macros, detailed RequestHeaderCodec macro, and provided example usage.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update rocketmq-macros README.md (1489)

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

documentation, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

In the land of code where macros play,
RocketMQ's README found a brighter way.
With clarity and structure, it now shines bright,
Guiding users through the coding night.
A hop and a skip, the changes are here,
Let's celebrate with a joyful cheer! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Dec 2, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added the waiting-review waiting review this PR label Dec 2, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the documentation📝 Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
rocketmq-macros/README.md (4)

1-7: Consider enhancing the overview section

While the title is now more concise, consider adding:

  • A brief description of what RocketMQ-Rust is
  • Installation instructions
  • Dependency requirements and version compatibility information

14-16: Add error handling documentation

The description would benefit from:

  • Examples of error scenarios when required fields are missing
  • The specific error types that can be returned
  • How to handle these errors in practice

20-40: Document custom types and field purposes

The example would be more helpful with:

  • Documentation for the CheetahString type and why it's used instead of String
  • Explanation of the TopicRequestHeader type and its purpose
  • Comments explaining the purpose of each field

43-44: Expand the example explanation

Consider adding:

  • Explanation of why #[serde(flatten)] is used with topic_request_header
  • Description of how optional fields are handled
  • Common use cases or scenarios where this header is used
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 02863a6 and 3eacc70.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-macros/README.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-macros/README.md (2)

1-44: Overall documentation improvements look good!

The README now provides a clearer structure and better explanation of the macros. While I've suggested some enhancements, the current changes are a significant improvement and align well with the PR objectives.


9-10: Clarify the status of RemotingSerializable macro

Since RemotingSerializable is noted as "not in use", please:

  • Explain why it's not in use
  • Document which alternative methods should be used instead
  • Consider adding a deprecation notice if applicable

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.55%. Comparing base (02863a6) to head (3eacc70).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1490   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   22.55%   22.55%           
=======================================
  Files         450      450           
  Lines       58500    58500           
=======================================
  Hits        13196    13196           
  Misses      45304    45304           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 728615a into main Dec 2, 2024
25 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Dec 2, 2024
@mxsm mxsm deleted the doc-1489 branch December 3, 2024 14:22
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge documentation📝 Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Doc📝] Update rocketmq-macros README.md
4 participants