[ISSUE #1529]Add #[inline] for MessageExtBrokerInner methods #1588
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces multiple new methods to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@rust-learn-now 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1588 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 25.32% 25.32%
=======================================
Files 459 459
Lines 60342 60342
=======================================
Hits 15282 15282
Misses 45060 45060 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_ext_broker_inner.rs(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_ext_broker_inner.rs (4)
60-68: LGTM! Version handling is well-implemented
The version getter and setter methods are appropriately marked as inline and provide good encapsulation.
Line range hint 200-252: LGTM! Secure handling of sensitive data
The Display and Debug implementations appropriately mask the encoded buffer content with "****" instead of exposing potentially sensitive data.
253-339: LGTM! Well-implemented trait with appropriate inlining
The MessageTrait implementation correctly delegates to the inner message and uses appropriate inlining for performance optimization. The delegation pattern is consistently applied across all methods.
Line range hint 50-58: Verify properties_string consistency
While the implementation is correct, there's a potential for the properties_string to become inconsistent with the internal message properties if not properly synchronized across all property modification methods.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the comprehensive search results, I can now provide a final response regarding the property consistency concern:
Properties are properly synchronized across all modifications
The implementation correctly maintains consistency between properties_string and internal message properties because:
- The
delete_propertymethod properly updates both:- Calls
clear_propertyon the inner message to update the properties map - Updates
properties_stringusingMessageUtils::delete_propertyutility
- Calls
- The MessageTrait implementation for MessageExtBrokerInner ensures all property modifications go through the inner message:
put_propertydelegates to inner messageclear_propertydelegates to inner messageget_propertydelegates to inner message
- The properties_string is regenerated from the authoritative properties map whenever properties are modified, as seen in various parts of the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all property modification methods to ensure they maintain consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'impl MessageExtBrokerInner {
$$$
fn $prop_method($$$) {
$$$
properties_string
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find property-related methods
rg -A 5 "properties_string" --type rust
Length of output: 27667
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Also search for property modification methods
rg -A 5 "property" --type rust
Length of output: 86097
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the struct definition to understand the fields
ast-grep --pattern 'struct MessageExtBrokerInner {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for implementations that might modify properties
ast-grep --pattern 'impl $_ for MessageExtBrokerInner {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 13310
| #[inline] | ||
| pub fn body_len(&self) -> usize { | ||
| self.message_ext_inner.message.body.as_ref().unwrap().len() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix potential panic in body_len
The current implementation will panic if body is None. This is unsafe and should be handled gracefully.
Consider this safer implementation:
#[inline]
pub fn body_len(&self) -> usize {
- self.message_ext_inner.message.body.as_ref().unwrap().len()
+ self.message_ext_inner.message.body.as_ref().map_or(0, |b| b.len())
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| #[inline] | |
| pub fn body_len(&self) -> usize { | |
| self.message_ext_inner.message.body.as_ref().unwrap().len() | |
| } | |
| #[inline] | |
| pub fn body_len(&self) -> usize { | |
| self.message_ext_inner.message.body.as_ref().map_or(0, |b| b.len()) | |
| } |
| #[inline] | ||
| pub fn tags_string2tags_code(_filter: &TopicFilterType, tags: &str) -> i64 { | ||
| if tags.is_empty() { | ||
| return 0; | ||
| } | ||
| JavaStringHasher::new().hash_str(tags) as i64 | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[inline] | ||
| pub fn tags_string_to_tags_code(tags: &str) -> i64 { | ||
| if tags.is_empty() { | ||
| return 0; | ||
| } | ||
| JavaStringHasher::new().hash_str(tags) as i64 | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate tag code conversion methods
There are two issues with the current implementation:
tags_string2tags_codeandtags_string_to_tags_codecontain duplicate logic- The
_filterparameter intags_string2tags_codeis unused but suggests it should affect the conversion
Consider consolidating these methods and properly utilizing the filter parameter:
- pub fn tags_string2tags_code(_filter: &TopicFilterType, tags: &str) -> i64 {
- if tags.is_empty() {
- return 0;
- }
- JavaStringHasher::new().hash_str(tags) as i64
- }
-
- #[inline]
- pub fn tags_string_to_tags_code(tags: &str) -> i64 {
+ #[inline]
+ pub fn tags_string_to_tags_code(filter: Option<&TopicFilterType>, tags: &str) -> i64 {
if tags.is_empty() {
return 0;
}
+ // TODO: Apply filter-specific logic if needed
JavaStringHasher::new().hash_str(tags) as i64
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1529
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
These updates significantly improve interaction with message properties and metadata, enhancing overall functionality.