Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[Issue #1294] Rocketmq-client supports the AllocateMessageQueueStrategy algorithm-AllocateMessageQueueByConfig #1651

Merged

Conversation

sainad2222
Copy link
Contributor

@sainad2222 sainad2222 commented Dec 7, 2024

Fixes #1294

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new message queue allocation strategy, enhancing the flexibility of message queue management.
    • Added a new struct for allocating message queues based on configuration settings.
  • Tests

    • Implemented tests for the new allocation strategy to ensure correct functionality and reliability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 7, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce a new module for message queue allocation strategies within the RocketMQ client. Specifically, a new module named allocate_message_queue_by_config is added, which implements the AllocateMessageQueueStrategy trait. This module includes a struct that manages a list of message queues and provides methods for allocation and naming. The existing functionality for validating consumer IDs and message queues remains unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/rebalance_strategy.rs Added module declaration for allocate_message_queue_by_config.
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/rebalance_strategy/allocate_message_queue_by_config.rs Introduced AllocateMessageQueueByConfig struct, including methods new, allocate, and get_name. Added a test module for functionality verification.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Support for the AllocateMessageQueueStrategy algorithm (#[1294])

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • mxsm

🐇 In the fields where queues align,
A new strategy we now define.
With messages hopping, oh so spry,
Allocate with config, let them fly!
In the code, we weave our tale,
A rabbit's joy, we shall not fail! 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Dec 7, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@sainad2222 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Dec 7, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.54545% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 26.28%. Comparing base (eb58d37) to head (9e8e8d3).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...lance_strategy/allocate_message_queue_by_config.rs 94.54% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1651      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   26.22%   26.28%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         463      464       +1     
  Lines       61245    61300      +55     
==========================================
+ Hits        16061    16113      +52     
- Misses      45184    45187       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/rebalance_strategy/allocate_message_queue_by_config.rs (4)

22-31: Add documentation for public API

The struct and its public constructor should be documented with rustdoc comments explaining their purpose, parameters, and usage examples.

Add documentation like this:

+/// A message queue allocation strategy that uses a predefined list of message queues.
+///
+/// This strategy always returns the same predefined list of message queues regardless
+/// of the consumer group configuration.
 pub struct AllocateMessageQueueByConfig {
     message_queue_list: Vec<MessageQueue>,
 }

 impl AllocateMessageQueueByConfig {
+    /// Creates a new instance with the specified list of message queues.
+    ///
+    /// # Arguments
+    /// * `message_queue_list` - The predefined list of message queues to be allocated
     #[inline]
     pub fn new(message_queue_list: Vec<MessageQueue>) -> Self {

50-90: Add more test coverage

The current test only covers the basic happy path. Consider adding tests for:

  • Empty message queue list
  • Invalid queues not present in mq_all
  • Different consumer group configurations

Here's an example test case:

#[test]
fn test_allocate_with_empty_queue_list() {
    let consumer_group = CheetahString::from("test_group");
    let current_cid = CheetahString::from("CID_PREFIX1");
    let mq_all = create_message_queue_list(4);
    let cid_all = create_consumer_id_list(2);
    let strategy = AllocateMessageQueueByConfig::new(vec![]);

    let result = strategy.allocate(&consumer_group, &current_cid, &mq_all, &cid_all);
    assert!(result.is_ok());
    assert!(result.unwrap().is_empty());
}

92-102: Consider moving test helpers to a shared module

The helper functions create_consumer_id_list and create_message_queue_list are well-structured and could be useful for other tests. Consider moving them to a shared test utilities module if they're needed elsewhere.


22-48: Consider future extensibility

While the current implementation provides basic configuration-based queue allocation, consider these architectural improvements for future versions:

  1. Add support for dynamic queue list updates
  2. Implement a builder pattern for more complex configurations
  3. Add metrics for monitoring queue allocation patterns

This would make the implementation more robust for production use.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb58d37 and 9e8e8d3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/rebalance_strategy.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/rebalance_strategy/allocate_message_queue_by_config.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/rebalance_strategy.rs (1)

19-19: LGTM! Module declaration follows consistent pattern

The new module declaration follows the same pattern as other allocation strategy modules and is appropriately placed in the file structure.

Comment on lines +33 to +48
impl AllocateMessageQueueStrategy for AllocateMessageQueueByConfig {
fn allocate(
&self,
consumer_group: &CheetahString,
current_cid: &CheetahString,
mq_all: &[MessageQueue],
cid_all: &[CheetahString],
) -> crate::Result<Vec<MessageQueue>> {
Ok(self.message_queue_list.clone())
}

#[inline]
fn get_name(&self) -> &'static str {
"CONFIG"
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Verify message queue validity

The allocate method currently returns the predefined queue list without validating if these queues exist in mq_all. This could lead to inconsistencies if the predefined list contains queues that are no longer available.

Consider adding validation:

 fn allocate(
     &self,
     consumer_group: &CheetahString,
     current_cid: &CheetahString,
     mq_all: &[MessageQueue],
     cid_all: &[CheetahString],
 ) -> crate::Result<Vec<MessageQueue>> {
+    // Verify all configured queues exist in mq_all
+    for queue in &self.message_queue_list {
+        if !mq_all.contains(queue) {
+            return Err(IllegalArgumentError(format!(
+                "Configured queue {:?} not found in available queues",
+                queue
+            )));
+        }
+    }
     Ok(self.message_queue_list.clone())
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
impl AllocateMessageQueueStrategy for AllocateMessageQueueByConfig {
fn allocate(
&self,
consumer_group: &CheetahString,
current_cid: &CheetahString,
mq_all: &[MessageQueue],
cid_all: &[CheetahString],
) -> crate::Result<Vec<MessageQueue>> {
Ok(self.message_queue_list.clone())
}
#[inline]
fn get_name(&self) -> &'static str {
"CONFIG"
}
}
impl AllocateMessageQueueStrategy for AllocateMessageQueueByConfig {
fn allocate(
&self,
consumer_group: &CheetahString,
current_cid: &CheetahString,
mq_all: &[MessageQueue],
cid_all: &[CheetahString],
) -> crate::Result<Vec<MessageQueue>> {
// Verify all configured queues exist in mq_all
for queue in &self.message_queue_list {
if !mq_all.contains(queue) {
return Err(IllegalArgumentError(format!(
"Configured queue {:?} not found in available queues",
queue
)));
}
}
Ok(self.message_queue_list.clone())
}
#[inline]
fn get_name(&self) -> &'static str {
"CONFIG"
}
}

Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mxsm mxsm added the approved PR has approved label Dec 7, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit cc274b0 into mxsm:main Dec 7, 2024
24 of 26 checks passed
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Rocketmq-client supports the AllocateMessageQueueStrategy algorithm-AllocateMessageQueueByConfig
4 participants