[ISSUE #1977]🔖Fix cargo clippy -- -D warnings error🚀

[mxsm]

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1977

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Removed inline attribute from ReferenceResource struct, which may subtly impact code compilation and performance characteristics.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a minor modification in the rocketmq-store module, specifically in the default_mapped_file_impl.rs file. The change focuses on removing the #[inline] attribute from the ReferenceResource struct declaration. This adjustment affects the compiler's inlining optimization strategy for the struct, potentially impacting how method calls are processed during compilation without altering the underlying logic or functionality of the struct.

Changes

File	Change Summary
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs	Removed #[inline] attribute from ReferenceResource struct declaration

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Fix cargo clippy warnings [#1977]	❓	Unclear if this specific change resolves clippy warnings without full context

Possibly related issues

• [Bug🐛] Fix cargo clippy -- -D warnings error #1970: Another clippy warning-related issue that might be connected to this change
• [Bug🐛] Fix cargo clippy -- -D warnings error #1539: Similar cargo clippy warning bug report

Possibly related PRs

• [ISSUE #1965]Adding #[inline] for DefaultMappedFile methods #1966: Adds #[inline] attributes to methods in DefaultMappedFile struct, showing a related optimization pattern

Suggested labels

bug, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

• TeslaRustor
• SpaceXCN

Poem

🐰 In the realm of Rust's compile-time dance,
An attribute removed with a subtle glance,
No function changed, just optimization's art,
A tiny tweak to make the compiler smart!
Inline or not, the code still sings its part. 🚀

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29b8b7a and 53b3083.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[rocketmq-rust-bot]

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉！

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥！

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.32%. Comparing base (c9f91be) to head (53b3083).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1978   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.32%   28.32%           
=======================================
  Files         486      486           
  Lines       68354    68354           
=======================================
  Hits        19363    19363           
  Misses      48991    48991           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.