-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
[ISSUE #1984]♻️Develop SearchInputWidget for tui🚀 #1985
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested Labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉! 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥! Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1985 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 28.32% 28.30% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 486 486
Lines 68356 68410 +54
==========================================
Hits 19362 19362
- Misses 48994 49048 +54 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs (2)
45-47
: Consider input validation
If the input string needs validation in the future (e.g., restricting special characters), provide a check here. Otherwise, this is fine for a simple TUI use-case.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 45-47: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L45-L47
Added lines #L45 - L47 were not covered by tests
65-78
: Key event handling is straightforward
The logic for capturing characters, backspace, and ignoring Enter is concise. However, consider also handling Delete or other relevant keys for a more complete user experience.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 65-76: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L65-L76
Added lines #L65 - L76 were not covered by tests
[warning] 78-78: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L78
Added line #L78 was not covered by tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs
(2 hunks)rocketmq-tui/src/ui.rs
(1 hunks)rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs
[warning] 41-44: rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs#L41-L44
Added lines #L41 - L44 were not covered by tests
[warning] 124-124: rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs#L124
Added line #L124 was not covered by tests
rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs
[warning] 38-43: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L38-L43
Added lines #L38 - L43 were not covered by tests
[warning] 45-47: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L45-L47
Added lines #L45 - L47 were not covered by tests
[warning] 49-51: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L49-L51
Added lines #L49 - L51 were not covered by tests
[warning] 53-55: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L53-L55
Added lines #L53 - L55 were not covered by tests
[warning] 57-59: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L57-L59
Added lines #L57 - L59 were not covered by tests
[warning] 61-63: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L61-L63
Added lines #L61 - L63 were not covered by tests
[warning] 65-76: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L65-L76
Added lines #L65 - L76 were not covered by tests
[warning] 78-78: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L78
Added line #L78 was not covered by tests
[warning] 82-84: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L82-L84
Added lines #L82 - L84 were not covered by tests
[warning] 86-86: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L86
Added line #L86 was not covered by tests
[warning] 89-107: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L89-L107
Added lines #L89 - L107 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (7)
rocketmq-tui/src/ui.rs (1)
17-17
: Elevated module visibility seems appropriate.
Changing search_input_widget
to pub(crate)
ensures that the module is accessible across the crate without exposing it outside. This is generally aligned with best practices to keep internal modules hidden from external consumers.
rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs (3)
28-35
: Struct creation and default trait usage
The struct’s fields and #[derive(Default)]
usage are correct. The comments help clarify intention. Good job keeping it straightforward.
38-43
: Add unit tests for constructor
While this constructor is straightforward, adding a brief test could verify default states (focused == false
and empty input
).
Would you like assistance in writing these tests?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 38-43: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L38-L43
Added lines #L38 - L43 were not covered by tests
81-107
: Rendering logic
The style toggles elegantly based on focus. Using Paragraph
to render text is straightforward. For a large TUI with more widgets, ensure consistent design patterns.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 82-84: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L82-L84
Added lines #L82 - L84 were not covered by tests
[warning] 86-86: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L86
Added line #L86 was not covered by tests
[warning] 89-107: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L89-L107
Added lines #L89 - L107 were not covered by tests
rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs (3)
31-36
: Seamless integration of the SearchInputWidget
Importing SearchInputWidget
and embedding it into RocketmqTuiApp
is a solid approach for modular TUI design.
41-44
: Test coverage suggestion
Integrate a test confirming that search_input
defaults as expected. Basic instantiation tests help ensure future regressions are caught early.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 41-44: rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs#L41-L44
Added lines #L41 - L44 were not covered by tests
124-124
: Dynamic rendering
Rendering &self.search_input
in the top chunk differentiates the search area from other UI sections. This keeps layering complexities minimal.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 124-124: rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs#L124
Added line #L124 was not covered by tests
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1984
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor