Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[ISSUE #1984]♻️Develop SearchInputWidget for tui🚀 #1985

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 1, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 1, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1984

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added an interactive search input widget to the application
    • Implemented keyboard input handling for search functionality
    • Enhanced user interface with a dynamic search component
  • Refactor

    • Improved modular design of search input management
    • Updated module visibility to support internal widget access

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 1, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new SearchInputWidget to the RocketMQ TUI application, enhancing the user interface with an interactive search input component. The changes involve creating a new widget struct with methods for managing input and focus, updating the application's main struct to incorporate this widget, and adjusting module visibility to support the new functionality. The implementation allows for dynamic text input and focus management within the terminal user interface.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs Added search_input: SearchInputWidget to the app struct, updated new() method to initialize the widget
rocketmq-tui/src/ui.rs Changed module visibility of search_input_widget to pub(crate)
rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs Created new SearchInputWidget with methods for input handling, focus management, and UI rendering

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Develop SearchInputWidget

Suggested Labels

feature, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of search delight,
Widgets dancing in terminal's light,
Input flows with graceful ease,
Focused cursor, code's sweet breeze,
RocketMQ TUI, now so bright! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 1, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 62 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.30%. Comparing base (5ef67ef) to head (98e6c86).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs 0.00% 57 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1985      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.32%   28.30%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         486      486              
  Lines       68356    68410      +54     
==========================================
  Hits        19362    19362              
- Misses      48994    49048      +54     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs (2)

45-47: Consider input validation
If the input string needs validation in the future (e.g., restricting special characters), provide a check here. Otherwise, this is fine for a simple TUI use-case.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 45-47: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L45-L47
Added lines #L45 - L47 were not covered by tests


65-78: Key event handling is straightforward
The logic for capturing characters, backspace, and ignoring Enter is concise. However, consider also handling Delete or other relevant keys for a more complete user experience.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 65-76: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L65-L76
Added lines #L65 - L76 were not covered by tests


[warning] 78-78: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L78
Added line #L78 was not covered by tests

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 67e0dd5 and 98e6c86.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-tui/src/ui.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs

[warning] 41-44: rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs#L41-L44
Added lines #L41 - L44 were not covered by tests


[warning] 124-124: rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs#L124
Added line #L124 was not covered by tests

rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs

[warning] 38-43: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L38-L43
Added lines #L38 - L43 were not covered by tests


[warning] 45-47: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L45-L47
Added lines #L45 - L47 were not covered by tests


[warning] 49-51: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L49-L51
Added lines #L49 - L51 were not covered by tests


[warning] 53-55: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L53-L55
Added lines #L53 - L55 were not covered by tests


[warning] 57-59: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L57-L59
Added lines #L57 - L59 were not covered by tests


[warning] 61-63: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L61-L63
Added lines #L61 - L63 were not covered by tests


[warning] 65-76: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L65-L76
Added lines #L65 - L76 were not covered by tests


[warning] 78-78: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L78
Added line #L78 was not covered by tests


[warning] 82-84: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L82-L84
Added lines #L82 - L84 were not covered by tests


[warning] 86-86: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L86
Added line #L86 was not covered by tests


[warning] 89-107: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L89-L107
Added lines #L89 - L107 were not covered by tests

🔇 Additional comments (7)
rocketmq-tui/src/ui.rs (1)

17-17: Elevated module visibility seems appropriate.
Changing search_input_widget to pub(crate) ensures that the module is accessible across the crate without exposing it outside. This is generally aligned with best practices to keep internal modules hidden from external consumers.

rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs (3)

28-35: Struct creation and default trait usage
The struct’s fields and #[derive(Default)] usage are correct. The comments help clarify intention. Good job keeping it straightforward.


38-43: Add unit tests for constructor
While this constructor is straightforward, adding a brief test could verify default states (focused == false and empty input).

Would you like assistance in writing these tests?

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 38-43: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L38-L43
Added lines #L38 - L43 were not covered by tests


81-107: Rendering logic
The style toggles elegantly based on focus. Using Paragraph to render text is straightforward. For a large TUI with more widgets, ensure consistent design patterns.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 82-84: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L82-L84
Added lines #L82 - L84 were not covered by tests


[warning] 86-86: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L86
Added line #L86 was not covered by tests


[warning] 89-107: rocketmq-tui/src/ui/search_input_widget.rs#L89-L107
Added lines #L89 - L107 were not covered by tests

rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs (3)

31-36: Seamless integration of the SearchInputWidget
Importing SearchInputWidget and embedding it into RocketmqTuiApp is a solid approach for modular TUI design.


41-44: Test coverage suggestion
Integrate a test confirming that search_input defaults as expected. Basic instantiation tests help ensure future regressions are caught early.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 41-44: rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs#L41-L44
Added lines #L41 - L44 were not covered by tests


124-124: Dynamic rendering
Rendering &self.search_input in the top chunk differentiates the search area from other UI sections. This keeps layering complexities minimal.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 124-124: rocketmq-tui/src/rocketmq_tui_app.rs#L124
Added line #L124 was not covered by tests

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit dde8f18 into main Jan 1, 2025
24 of 26 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 1, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the feature-1984 branch January 1, 2025 05:55
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. rocketmq-tui crate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Develop SearchInputWidget for tui
3 participants