Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[ISSUE #2029]💫Implement PopBufferMergeService#get_latest_offset #2030

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 2, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2029

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced offset retrieval functionality in the PopBufferMergeService
    • Added a new method to retrieve latest offset with additional context
  • Refactor

    • Updated method signatures for more precise offset management
    • Improved logic for handling empty queues and offset tracking

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the PopBufferMergeService in the RocketMQ broker's processor service. The primary changes involve updating the get_latest_offset method to accept a CheetahString parameter instead of a &str and introducing a new method get_latest_offset_full. The implementation now retrieves the latest offset from a commit_offsets map, returning -1 if the queue is empty or the next begin offset from the last queue element.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs - Added KeyBuilder import
- Updated get_latest_offset method signature and implementation
- Added new get_latest_offset_full method

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement PopBufferMergeService#get_latest_offset [#2029]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first, rocketmq-broker crate

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🚀 Offsets dancing, keys so bright,
In RocketMQ's code, a rabbit's delight!
CheetahString leaps, methods take flight,
Merging buffers with algorithmic might,
A coding adventure, pure and light! 🐰


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 2, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Jan 2, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs (2)

171-185: Add documentation and improve error handling.

While the implementation is correct, consider these improvements:

  1. Add documentation comments explaining:
    • The purpose of the method
    • Parameter description
    • Return value meaning (-1 vs valid offset)
  2. Consider adding debug/trace logging when returning -1 to aid in troubleshooting.

Example documentation:

+    /// Returns the latest offset for a given lock key.
+    /// 
+    /// # Arguments
+    /// * `lock_key` - The lock key in format topic@cid@queueId
+    /// 
+    /// # Returns
+    /// * `-1` if no offset exists or queue is empty
+    /// * The next begin offset from the last checkpoint otherwise
     #[inline]
     pub fn get_latest_offset(&self, lock_key: &CheetahString) -> i64 {

187-195: Add documentation and input validation.

The method provides a convenient wrapper around get_latest_offset, but needs:

  1. Documentation explaining its purpose and parameters
  2. Input validation for queue_id (should be non-negative)

Consider this improved implementation:

+    /// Returns the latest offset for the given topic, consumer group, and queue ID combination.
+    /// 
+    /// # Arguments
+    /// * `topic` - The topic name
+    /// * `group` - The consumer group name
+    /// * `queue_id` - The queue ID (must be non-negative)
+    /// 
+    /// # Returns
+    /// * `-1` if no offset exists or queue is empty
+    /// * The next begin offset from the last checkpoint otherwise
     pub fn get_latest_offset_full(
         &self,
         topic: &CheetahString,
         group: &CheetahString,
         queue_id: i32,
     ) -> i64 {
+        if queue_id < 0 {
+            return -1;
+        }
         self.get_latest_offset(&CheetahString::from_string(KeyBuilder::build_polling_key(
             topic, group, queue_id,
         )))
     }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83e6974 and 39f5288.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs (1)

26-26: LGTM!

The KeyBuilder import is correctly added and will be used by the new get_latest_offset_full method.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 21 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.44%. Comparing base (83e6974) to head (39f5288).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ssor/processor_service/pop_buffer_merge_service.rs 0.00% 21 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2030      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.45%   28.44%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         488      488              
  Lines       68818    68838      +20     
==========================================
  Hits        19583    19583              
- Misses      49235    49255      +20     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. rocketmq-broker crate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Implement PopBufferMergeService#get_latest_offset
3 participants