[ISSUE #1515]♻️Refactor DeleteKVConfigRequestHeader with derive marco RequestHeaderCodec #2140
Conversation
… RequestHeaderCodec
WalkthroughThe pull request refactors the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉！ 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥！ Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
requested review from
rocketmq-rust-bot,
SpaceXCN and
TeslaRustor
mxsm
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/namesrv/kv_config_header.rs (1)
Line range hint
100-106: Consider adding documentation comments.While the implementation is clean and follows good practices, consider adding documentation comments to match the style of other request headers (like
PutKVConfigRequestHeader). This would improve API documentation consistency.Add documentation similar to this:
/// Creates a new instance of `DeleteKVConfigRequestHeader`. /// /// # Arguments /// /// * `namespace` - The namespace. /// * `key` - The key. pub fn new(namespace: impl Into<CheetahString>, key: impl Into<CheetahString>) -> Self {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/namesrv/kv_config_header.rs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (3)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/namesrv/kv_config_header.rs (3)
91-91: Great use of the RequestHeaderCodec derive macro!The refactoring aligns well with the codebase's patterns and reduces boilerplate by replacing manual trait implementations with the derive macro. This change improves maintainability and reduces the potential for implementation errors.
93-97: Well-structured field declarations!The field declarations follow the established pattern with proper use of
#[required]attributes andCheetahStringtypes, ensuring consistency with other request headers in the codebase.
Line range hint
91-106: Verify removal of trait implementations.The removal of
CommandCustomHeaderandFromMaptrait implementations is replaced by theRequestHeaderCodecderive macro. Let's verify there are no remaining direct uses of these traits forDeleteKVConfigRequestHeader.✅ Verification successful
Trait removal is safe and properly replaced
The removal of
CommandCustomHeaderandFromMaptrait implementations is safe as:
- All usages found in the codebase are compatible with the new
RequestHeaderCodecderive macro- No direct usage of the removed trait methods was found
- The struct is only used in contexts that work with the current implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining uses of DeleteKVConfigRequestHeader with the old trait methods # Look for to_map() method calls rg -l "DeleteKVConfigRequestHeader.*to_map\(\)" # Look for FromMap::from construction rg -l "DeleteKVConfigRequestHeader::from\(" # Look for direct trait bounds rg -l "T: .*DeleteKVConfigRequestHeader.*(CommandCustomHeader|FromMap)"Length of output: 169
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all references to DeleteKVConfigRequestHeader echo "=== All references to DeleteKVConfigRequestHeader ===" rg "DeleteKVConfigRequestHeader" -B 2 -A 2 # Find any trait implementations or bounds echo -e "\n=== Trait implementations or bounds ===" ast-grep --pattern 'impl $_ for DeleteKVConfigRequestHeader'Length of output: 4199
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2140 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 28.24% 28.25% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 497 497
Lines 71056 71026 -30
==========================================
Hits 20070 20070
+ Misses 50986 50956 -30 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1515
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
DeleteKVConfigRequestHeaderstructure to support request header serializationnamespaceandkeyfields to the header