Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[ISSUE #2205]🐛Fix stats_item.rs cargo clippy -- -D warnings error🍻 #2206

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 11, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2205

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Improved code readability by updating emptiness check for list in stats computation methods
    • Replaced cs_list.len() > 0 with more idiomatic !cs_list.is_empty()

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the stats_item.rs file in the RocketMQ Rust project, specifically updating the emptiness check for cs_list from cs_list.len() > 0 to the more idiomatic Rust method !cs_list.is_empty(). This change improves code readability while maintaining the existing logic for checking list contents in the compute_stats_data and sampling methods.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-common/src/common/stats/stats_item.rs Replaced cs_list.len() > 0 with !cs_list.is_empty() in multiple methods

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Fix cargo clippy warnings in stats_item.rs [#2205]

Suggested labels

refactor♻️, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first, documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🐰 A Clippy Bunny's Delight

In Rust's green meadow, code so bright,
is_empty() hops with pure delight,
Replacing length with grace and might,
A cleaner path, a coder's flight!

Hop, hop, hooray! 🚀✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6174edd and f3fde3e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-common/src/common/stats/stats_item.rs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-common/src/common/stats/stats_item.rs (2)

59-59: LGTM! Idiomatic Rust improvement.

The change from cs_list.len() > 0 to !cs_list.is_empty() is a good improvement that follows Rust's idioms. This addresses the Clippy len_zero lint while maintaining the same behavior.


59-59: Consider similar improvements in sampling methods.

While this change is good, there are similar emptiness checks in the sampling methods (sampling_in_seconds, sampling_in_minutes, sampling_in_hour) that could benefit from the same idiomatic improvement.

Here's how to apply the same improvement to all sampling methods:

// In sampling_in_seconds
-if cs_list.is_empty() {
// In sampling_in_minutes
-if cs_list.is_empty() {
// In sampling_in_hour
-if cs_list.is_empty() {

These are already using the idiomatic form, so I apologize for the confusion. The code is consistent across all methods.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.74%. Comparing base (6174edd) to head (f3fde3e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2206   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.74%   28.74%           
=======================================
  Files         498      498           
  Lines       71077    71077           
=======================================
  Hits        20430    20430           
  Misses      50647    50647           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit ebcce97 into main Jan 11, 2025
25 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 11, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the bug-2205 branch January 11, 2025 13:52
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge bug🐛 Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug🐛] Fix stats_item.rs cargo clippy -- -D warnings error
3 participants