Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[ISSUE #2281]🚀BrokerStatsManager and ColdDataCgCtrService add start method #2284

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 16, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2283

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added start method to ColdDataPullRequestHoldService
    • Added start method to NotificationProcessor
  • Chores

    • Placeholder implementations for new service start methods with warning logs

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a start method to two services in the RocketMQ Rust broker: ColdDataPullRequestHoldService and NotificationProcessor. Both methods are currently placeholder implementations that log a warning about being unimplemented. These additions appear to be part of a broader effort to standardize service initialization across the broker's components.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-broker/src/coldctr/cold_data_pull_request_hold_service.rs Added pub fn start(&mut self) method with warning log
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/notification_processor.rs Added pub fn start(&mut self) method with warning log

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add start method to services [#2281]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🚀 Rabbit's Startup Ballad 🐰

In Rust's cold realm of broker's might,
New methods start their humble flight
With warnings logged and placeholders set
Our services prepare, no need to fret!
A rabbit's code takes gentle wing 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Jan 16, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 16, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3e692a and ddeb110.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/coldctr/cold_data_pull_request_hold_service.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/notification_processor.rs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-broker/src/coldctr/cold_data_pull_request_hold_service.rs (1)

24-26: Verify service naming discrepancy with PR objectives.

The PR objectives mention adding start methods to BrokerStatsManager and ColdDataCgCtrService, but this implementation is for ColdDataPullRequestHoldService. Please clarify if this is the intended service or if there's a naming discrepancy.

✅ Verification successful

PR objectives need updating to include ColdDataPullRequestHoldService

The implementation is correct. Both ColdDataPullRequestHoldService and ColdDataCgCtrService are independent but related components in the cold data control system, as evidenced by their presence in the broker runtime. The PR objectives should be updated to include the start method implementation for ColdDataPullRequestHoldService as well.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for BrokerStatsManager and ColdDataCgCtrService in the codebase
echo "Searching for mentioned services in codebase:"
rg -l "BrokerStatsManager|ColdDataCgCtrService"

Length of output: 1003


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ColdDataPullRequestHoldService references and potential relationships
echo "Searching for ColdDataPullRequestHoldService references:"
rg "ColdDataPullRequestHoldService" -B 2 -A 2

echo -e "\nSearching for relationships in coldctr module:"
rg "ColdDataCgCtrService|ColdDataPullRequestHoldService" rocketmq-broker/src/coldctr/ -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 4654

rocketmq-broker/src/processor/notification_processor.rs (1)

25-28: Consider implementing the processor functionality.

This processor has multiple unimplemented methods (start, shutdown, process_request). Consider implementing the actual functionality or providing a timeline for implementation. This will help maintain the stability and completeness of the codebase.

Comment on lines +24 to +26
pub fn start(&mut self) {
warn!("ColdDataPullRequestHoldService started not implemented");
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add documentation and improve warning message consistency.

The new start method should:

  1. Include documentation explaining its purpose and behavior
  2. Use consistent warning message format with the shutdown method
  3. Consider returning a Result type for error handling
+    /// Starts the ColdDataPullRequestHoldService.
+    ///
+    /// # Returns
+    /// Result indicating success or failure of the start operation.
-    pub fn start(&mut self) {
-        warn!("ColdDataPullRequestHoldService started not implemented");
+    pub fn start(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {
+        warn!("ColdDataPullRequestHoldService start not implemented, need to implement it");
+        Ok(())
     }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
pub fn start(&mut self) {
warn!("ColdDataPullRequestHoldService started not implemented");
}
/// Starts the ColdDataPullRequestHoldService.
///
/// # Returns
/// Result indicating success or failure of the start operation.
pub fn start(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {
warn!("ColdDataPullRequestHoldService start not implemented, need to implement it");
Ok(())
}

Comment on lines +25 to +27
pub fn start(&mut self) {
warn!("NotificationProcessor started unimplemented, need to implement it");
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add documentation and implement proper error handling.

The new start method should:

  1. Include documentation explaining its purpose and behavior
  2. Return a Result type for error handling
  3. Consider implementing the actual functionality instead of just logging
+    /// Starts the NotificationProcessor.
+    ///
+    /// # Returns
+    /// Result indicating success or failure of the start operation.
-    pub fn start(&mut self) {
-        warn!("NotificationProcessor started unimplemented, need to implement it");
+    pub fn start(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {
+        warn!("NotificationProcessor start not implemented, need to implement it");
+        Ok(())
     }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
pub fn start(&mut self) {
warn!("NotificationProcessor started unimplemented, need to implement it");
}
/// Starts the NotificationProcessor.
///
/// # Returns
/// Result indicating success or failure of the start operation.
pub fn start(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {
warn!("NotificationProcessor start not implemented, need to implement it");
Ok(())
}

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.24%. Comparing base (a3e692a) to head (ddeb110).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...src/coldctr/cold_data_pull_request_hold_service.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
...tmq-broker/src/processor/notification_processor.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2284      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.24%   28.24%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         504      504              
  Lines       72363    72369       +6     
==========================================
  Hits        20438    20438              
- Misses      51925    51931       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit d135cb2 into main Jan 16, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 16, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the feature-2283 branch January 16, 2025 03:24
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] ColdDataPullRequestHoldService and NotificationProcessor add start method
3 participants