Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[Enhancement⚡️] Replace SendResult String with CheetahString #2416

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 26, 2025

Conversation

0xfffb
Copy link
Contributor

@0xfffb 0xfffb commented Jan 25, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Close #1711

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Refactor

    • Updated internal access modifiers for PullResult struct to improve encapsulation
    • Replaced direct field access with method calls across multiple components
    • Added getter and setter methods for PullResult fields
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced data structure safety by using method-based property access
    • Restricted field visibility to current crate for better code organization

These changes are primarily internal improvements to the RocketMQ client library's data handling mechanisms.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 25, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces systematic changes across multiple files in the RocketMQ Rust implementation, focusing on modifying how PullResult properties are accessed. The changes primarily involve transitioning from direct field access to method calls and adjusting field visibility in the PullResult struct. These modifications enhance encapsulation by making fields crate-private and introducing getter and setter methods, while maintaining the existing logic and functionality of the affected components.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-broker/src/failover/escape_bridge.rs Updated method calls for pull_status and msg_found_list in get_message_from_remote_async
rocketmq-broker/src/out_api/broker_outer_api.rs Modified access to pull_status, min_offset, and max_offset using method calls in pull_message_from_specific_broker_async and process_pull_result
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_revive_service.rs Changed property access in get_revive_message and reach_tail functions to use method calls
rocketmq-broker/src/transaction/queue/transactional_message_bridge.rs Updated PullResult instantiation method in get_message
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/pull_result.rs Changed field visibility to pub(crate) and added getter/setter methods for PullResult

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
[#1711] Replace SendResult String with CheetahString No direct changes related to CheetahString were made in this PR

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement⚡️, approved, auto merge, AI review first, rocketmq-broker crate

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🐰 Hopping through the code with glee,
Methods now call so gracefully,
Fields now hidden, safe and sound,
Encapsulation has been found!
RocketMQ's Rust, a rabbit's delight! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@0xfffb 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_revive_service.rs (1)

226-226: Consider documenting the cloning behavior.

The change to msg_found_list().clone() is necessary for ownership semantics, but it involves cloning the message list. Consider adding a comment explaining why the clone is needed and any performance implications.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d64e68 and a1c1ef6.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/failover/escape_bridge.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/out_api/broker_outer_api.rs (4 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_revive_service.rs (3 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/transaction/queue/transactional_message_bridge.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/pull_result.rs (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (9)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/pull_result.rs (3)

24-28: Good encapsulation of PullResult fields!

Changing field visibility from pub to pub(crate) improves encapsulation by restricting direct field access to within the crate. This is a good practice as it provides better control over the API and allows for future modifications without breaking external code.


48-71: Well-designed getter methods with appropriate return types!

The getter methods are correctly implemented with:

  • References returned for complex types (PullStatus, Vec)
  • Direct values returned for primitive types (u64)
  • Appropriate use of #[inline] attribute for performance optimization

73-76: Verify if other fields need setters.

While the set_msg_found_list implementation is correct, please confirm if other fields like pull_status, next_begin_offset, etc., should also have setters. If they are meant to be immutable after construction, consider documenting this design decision.

rocketmq-broker/src/transaction/queue/transactional_message_bridge.rs (1)

215-227: Clean adaptation to use PullResult constructor!

The code correctly uses PullResult::new with proper parameter ordering, adapting to the encapsulation changes in the PullResult struct.

rocketmq-broker/src/failover/escape_bridge.rs (1)

588-600: Correct adaptation to use getter methods!

The code properly adapts to the new encapsulation by:

  • Using pull_status() with correct dereferencing
  • Using msg_found_list() with proper reference handling
rocketmq-broker/src/out_api/broker_outer_api.rs (1)

547-547: Consistent adaptation to the new PullResult API!

The changes correctly implement the new encapsulation pattern by:

  • Using getter methods instead of direct field access
  • Using the PullResult constructor consistently

Also applies to: 627-627, 644-644, 649-649, 681-687

rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_revive_service.rs (3)

210-211: LGTM! Improved encapsulation with method-based access.

The change from direct field access to method calls with proper dereferencing aligns with Rust's best practices for data encapsulation.


223-223: LGTM! Consistent use of getter method.

The offset calculation using the getter method maintains correctness while improving encapsulation.


807-807: Consider adding bounds checking for offset conversion.

The comparison offset == pull_result.max_offset() as i64 involves casting from u64 to i64, which could potentially overflow for very large offsets. Consider adding bounds checking or documenting the assumed offset range.

Run this script to check for potential large offset values in the codebase:

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 25, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 29 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.58%. Comparing base (ec358cb) to head (a1c1ef6).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
rocketmq-broker/src/out_api/broker_outer_api.rs 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-broker/src/failover/escape_bridge.rs 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
.../transaction/queue/transactional_message_bridge.rs 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
.../processor/processor_service/pop_revive_service.rs 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2416      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.59%   28.58%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         508      508              
  Lines       73393    73416      +23     
==========================================
  Hits        20989    20989              
- Misses      52404    52427      +23     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mxsm mxsm merged commit e850544 into mxsm:main Jan 26, 2025
23 of 28 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 26, 2025
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge Difficulty level/Easy Easy ISSUE enhancement⚡️ New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Replace SendResult String with CheetahString
4 participants