Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

refactor: reference parameters for MessageListenerOrderlyFn #2417

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2025

Conversation

0xfffb
Copy link
Contributor

@0xfffb 0xfffb commented Jan 26, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Close #1677

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

cargo test

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated message listener function signature to use borrowing instead of ownership for improved memory efficiency and performance.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 26, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the MessageListenerOrderlyFn type alias in the RocketMQ client library. The change updates the function signature to use borrowed types (&[MessageExt] and &ConsumeOrderlyContext) instead of owned types, which can potentially improve memory efficiency and reduce unnecessary cloning when working with message listeners in an orderly consumption mode.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/listener/message_listener_orderly.rs Updated type alias MessageListenerOrderlyFn to use borrowed slice and reference types

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Optimize MessageListenerOrderlyFn signature [#1677]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

refactor♻️, approved, auto merge, AI review first, rocketmq-client crate

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🚀 Hoppity hop, through the code we leap,
Borrowing slices, making memory cheap,
RocketMQ's listener, now sleek and light,
Efficiency dancing with pure delight!
A rabbit's refactor, clean and bright 🐰


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@0xfffb 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e850544 and a7724ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/listener/message_listener_orderly.rs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/listener/message_listener_orderly.rs (2)

36-36: Performance improvement: Efficient memory usage with references.

Good change! Using references instead of owned types:

  • Eliminates unnecessary cloning of messages
  • Reduces memory allocations
  • Improves performance for large message batches

Line range hint 26-30: Consider aligning parameter types between trait and function.

There's an inconsistency in how message parameters are handled:

  • Trait uses &[&MessageExt]
  • Function uses &[MessageExt]

Also, the context parameter differs:

  • Trait uses &mut ConsumeOrderlyContext
  • Function uses &ConsumeOrderlyContext

These differences might lead to confusion or inefficiencies when implementing both patterns.

Let's verify the usage patterns:

Also applies to: 36-36

@@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ pub trait MessageListenerOrderly: Sync + Send {
pub type ArcBoxMessageListenerOrderly = Arc<Box<dyn MessageListenerOrderly>>;

pub type MessageListenerOrderlyFn = Arc<
dyn Fn(Vec<MessageExt>, ConsumeOrderlyContext) -> Result<ConsumeOrderlyStatus> + Send + Sync,
dyn Fn(&[MessageExt], &ConsumeOrderlyContext) -> Result<ConsumeOrderlyStatus> + Send + Sync,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Breaking Change: Function signature updated to use references.

The change from owned types to references (Vec<MessageExt>&[MessageExt], ConsumeOrderlyContext&ConsumeOrderlyContext) improves performance by avoiding unnecessary cloning, but this is a breaking change that will require updates to existing implementations.

Please consider:

  1. Adding migration documentation
  2. Incrementing the major version number
  3. Providing examples of how to update existing code

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 26, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.58%. Comparing base (e850544) to head (a7724ce).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2417   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.58%   28.58%           
=======================================
  Files         508      508           
  Lines       73416    73416           
=======================================
  Hits        20989    20989           
  Misses      52427    52427           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mxsm mxsm merged commit ef8b2b1 into mxsm:main Jan 26, 2025
25 of 28 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 26, 2025
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge Difficulty level/Easy Easy ISSUE enhancement⚡️ New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Optimize MessageListenerOrderlyFn signature
4 participants