-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
refactor: reference parameters for MessageListenerOrderlyFn #2417
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@0xfffb 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉! 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥! Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/listener/message_listener_orderly.rs
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/listener/message_listener_orderly.rs (2)
36-36
: Performance improvement: Efficient memory usage with references.Good change! Using references instead of owned types:
- Eliminates unnecessary cloning of messages
- Reduces memory allocations
- Improves performance for large message batches
Line range hint
26-30
: Consider aligning parameter types between trait and function.There's an inconsistency in how message parameters are handled:
- Trait uses
&[&MessageExt]
- Function uses
&[MessageExt]
Also, the context parameter differs:
- Trait uses
&mut ConsumeOrderlyContext
- Function uses
&ConsumeOrderlyContext
These differences might lead to confusion or inefficiencies when implementing both patterns.
Let's verify the usage patterns:
Also applies to: 36-36
@@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ pub trait MessageListenerOrderly: Sync + Send { | |||
pub type ArcBoxMessageListenerOrderly = Arc<Box<dyn MessageListenerOrderly>>; | |||
|
|||
pub type MessageListenerOrderlyFn = Arc< | |||
dyn Fn(Vec<MessageExt>, ConsumeOrderlyContext) -> Result<ConsumeOrderlyStatus> + Send + Sync, | |||
dyn Fn(&[MessageExt], &ConsumeOrderlyContext) -> Result<ConsumeOrderlyStatus> + Send + Sync, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Breaking Change: Function signature updated to use references.
The change from owned types to references (Vec<MessageExt>
→ &[MessageExt]
, ConsumeOrderlyContext
→ &ConsumeOrderlyContext
) improves performance by avoiding unnecessary cloning, but this is a breaking change that will require updates to existing implementations.
Please consider:
- Adding migration documentation
- Incrementing the major version number
- Providing examples of how to update existing code
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2417 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 28.58% 28.58%
=======================================
Files 508 508
Lines 73416 73416
=======================================
Hits 20989 20989
Misses 52427 52427 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Close #1677
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
cargo test
Summary by CodeRabbit