Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[ISSUE #2434]🔨Fix jekyll-gh-pages.yml action error #2435

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 30, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2434

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow configuration for Jekyll site deployment
    • Specified artifact upload path for more precise site generation and deployment

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow for Jekyll site deployment by adding a specific path parameter to the "Upload artifact" step. The change explicitly defines the artifact upload location as rocketmq-doc/_site, which provides more precise configuration for the site's build and deployment process.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml Added path: rocketmq-doc/_site to the "Upload artifact" step in the "build" job

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Fix Jekyll-gh-pages workflow error [#2434]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement⚡️

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🐰 A Jekyll workflow, once astray,
Now finds its path with clarity's ray
Artifact uploaded, precise and bright
Deployment dancing in GitHub's light
Rabbit's code magic saves the day! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 30, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the bug🐛 Something isn't working label Jan 30, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.64%. Comparing base (9b9fbe7) to head (ade5b19).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2435   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.64%   28.64%           
=======================================
  Files         510      510           
  Lines       73491    73491           
=======================================
  Hits        21048    21048           
  Misses      52443    52443           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (1)

41-42: Consider using environment variables for path consistency.

While the current implementation works correctly, consider defining the Jekyll source and destination paths as environment variables at the workflow level for better maintainability and consistency.

Here's how you could improve it:

name: Deploy Jekyll with GitHub Pages dependencies preinstalled

on:
  push:
    branches: ["main"]  
    paths: ["rocketmq-doc/**"]

  workflow_dispatch:

+ env:
+   JEKYLL_SOURCE: ./rocketmq-doc
+   JEKYLL_DEST: ./rocketmq-doc/_site

jobs:
  build:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Build with Jekyll
        uses: actions/jekyll-build-pages@v1
        with:
-         source: ./rocketmq-doc
-         destination: ./rocketmq-doc/_site
+         source: ${{ env.JEKYLL_SOURCE }}
+         destination: ${{ env.JEKYLL_DEST }}
      - name: Upload artifact
        uses: actions/upload-pages-artifact@v3
        with:
-         path: rocketmq-doc/_site
+         path: ${{ env.JEKYLL_DEST }}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b9fbe7 and ade5b19.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (1)

41-42: LGTM! The path parameter addition fixes the artifact upload.

The explicit path specification ensures that the correct build output from Jekyll is uploaded, matching the destination path from the build step.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 99dbe3a into main Jan 30, 2025
26 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 30, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the mxsm-patch-1 branch January 30, 2025 13:19
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge bug🐛 Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug🐛] Fix jekyll-gh-pages.yml action error
3 participants