[ISSUE #2452]Update Add Algolia Crawler Github Action crawler-name

[mxsm]

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2452

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated GitHub Pages deployment workflow to include a specific crawler name for Algolia indexing.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new input parameter crawler-name to the GitHub Actions workflow for Jekyll deployment. Specifically, the change is made in the .github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml file, adding a unique crawler name parameter to the Algolia search crawler action. This modification allows for more precise identification and management of the Algolia crawler during the site deployment process.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml	Added crawler-name input parameter to Algolia crawler GitHub Action

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
[#2452] Update Algolia Crawler Github Action	✅

Possibly related PRs

• [ISSUE #2440]Add algolia support #2441: Adds Algolia support by modifying _config.yml
• [ISSUE #2442]Add algolia support #2443: Updates Algolia settings in _config.yml
• [ISSUE #2450]Add Algolia Crawler Github Action #2451: Adds Algolia crawler step in Jekyll deployment workflow

Suggested labels

enhancement⚡️, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

• TeslaRustor
• SpaceXCN
• rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🚀 A crawler named with care,
In GitHub's workflow, beyond compare,
Algolia's magic, now so bright,
Searching pages with pure delight!
A rabbit's code, precise and neat 🐰

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7f4e734 and 5d0fe82.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)

• GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
• GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
• GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
• GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
• GitHub Check: test
• GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
• GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
• GitHub Check: build
• GitHub Check: auto-approve

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (1)

63-63: LGTM! Consider documenting the crawler name format.

The addition of a unique crawler name parameter is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives.

Let's verify the crawler name format and uniqueness:

Consider adding a comment above the crawler-name parameter to document the naming convention used (e.g., project_domain_unique-suffix). This will help future maintainers understand the structure of the crawler name.

+          # Crawler name format: project_domain_unique-suffix
           crawler-name: 'rocketmq_rust_ljbmxsm_com_a7p4xel1x0_pages'

✅ Verification successful

Crawler name verified as unique and properly formatted

The crawler name follows a consistent format matching the site URL and is unique across the codebase. The original suggestion to add documentation about the naming convention still stands as a nice-to-have improvement.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the crawler name follows the expected format and is unique across the codebase

# Check for any duplicate crawler names
rg -i "crawler-name.*rocketmq_rust_ljbmxsm_com_a7p4xel1x0_pages" --type yaml

# Check if there are any other crawler names following a similar pattern
rg -i "crawler-name.*ljbmxsm\.com" --type yaml

Length of output: 127

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, check if the file exists and view its content
echo "=== Checking file existence and content ==="
fd -t f "jekyll-gh-pages.yml" .github/workflows/
[ -f ".github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml" ] && cat ".github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml"

echo -e "\n=== Searching for any crawler-name patterns ==="
# More flexible search for crawler-name patterns
rg -i "crawler-name" --type yaml

Length of output: 2525

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[rocketmq-rust-bot]

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉！

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥！

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.63%. Comparing base (7f4e734) to head (5d0fe82).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2453   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.63%   28.63%           
=======================================
  Files         510      510           
  Lines       73487    73487           
=======================================
  Hits        21044    21044           
  Misses      52443    52443           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rocketmq-rust-bot]

LGTM