[ISSUE #2546]🔨Fix package_publish_workspace.bat error🔥

[mxsm]

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2546

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Streamlined the project packaging configuration to simplify variable assignment while maintaining the same functionality.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The change updates the way the PROJECTS variable is defined in the distribution/package_publish_workspace.bat script. The modification removes an inline comment and simplifies the syntax while retaining the same list of project names and overall logic. The control flow, error handling, and subsequent processing remain unchanged.

Changes

File	Change Summary
distribution/package_publish_workspace.bat	Updated the definition of the PROJECTS variable by removing an inline comment and simplifying syntax.

Possibly related PRs

• [ISSUE #2544]🔨Update package_publish_workspace.bat 🔥 #2545: Modifies the PROJECTS variable in the same script using a different syntactical approach.

Suggested labels

approved

Suggested reviewers

• TeslaRustor
• SpaceXCN

Poem

I'm a rabbit hopping with glee,
Celebrating code changes, simple and free.
No fuss in syntax, just neat and clear,
Wiggling my ears for a smoother year.
With carrots in hand, I cheer this delight!
🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0a44bf and 0f5186c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• distribution/package_publish_workspace.bat (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• distribution/package_publish_workspace.bat

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)

• GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
• GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
• GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
• GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
• GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
• GitHub Check: build
• GitHub Check: test
• GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
• GitHub Check: auto-approve

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[rocketmq-rust-bot]

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉！

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥！

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.79%. Comparing base (d0a44bf) to head (0f5186c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2547   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.79%   28.79%           
=======================================
  Files         511      511           
  Lines       73718    73718           
=======================================
  Hits        21224    21224           
  Misses      52494    52494           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rocketmq-rust-bot]

LGTM