Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Bulk pull ascending flag #3867

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 20, 2022

Conversation

clemahieu
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

…g requests the server to operate on account chains in ascending order toward higher block hight, rather than descending order toward the initial block.
@clemahieu clemahieu added the protocol change Change to protocol requiring new version label Jul 18, 2022
@clemahieu clemahieu added this to the V24.0 milestone Jul 18, 2022
nano/core_test/bootstrap.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
nano/core_test/bootstrap.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
nano/core_test/bootstrap.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
nano/core_test/bootstrap.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
nano/core_test/bootstrap.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
@clemahieu clemahieu merged commit a8681a4 into nanocurrency:develop Jul 20, 2022
dsiganos pushed a commit to dsiganos/nano-node that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2022
* Add a new flag to the bulk_pull messaged called 'ascending'. This flag requests the server to operate on account chains in ascending order toward higher block hight, rather than descending order toward the initial block.
* Increasing protocol version indicating support for the bulk_pull ascending flag.
* Adding separate convenience function section and commenting node::process function.
# Conflicts:
#	nano/core_test/message.cpp
dsiganos pushed a commit to dsiganos/nano-node that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2022
* Add a new flag to the bulk_pull messaged called 'ascending'. This flag requests the server to operate on account chains in ascending order toward higher block hight, rather than descending order toward the initial block.
* Increasing protocol version indicating support for the bulk_pull ascending flag.
* Adding separate convenience function section and commenting node::process function.
# Conflicts:
#	nano/core_test/message.cpp
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
protocol change Change to protocol requiring new version
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants