Refactor shell package #96
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces two new functions to display usage and version details for the CLI tool. Several shell command implementations are refactored to delegate operations to a unified usecases layer instead of directly calling individual interactors. Additionally, the dependency injection wiring is updated to incorporate this consolidated approach. New documentation sections and links have been added to describe auto-generation of DI and mock files. Overall, the changes focus on streamlining command execution and improving code organization without altering external functionality. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant S as Shell
participant UC as Usecases
participant I as Interactor (DB/CSV/Excel/etc.)
U->>S: Enter command (e.g., dump, header, import)
S->>UC: Delegate command execution
UC->>I: Invoke specific use case method
I-->>UC: Return operation result
UC-->>S: Pass back consolidated result
S-->>U: Display output
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Code Metrics Report
Details | | main (8b93dfc) | #96 (33a6a13) | +/- |
|---------------------|----------------|---------------|-------|
+ | Coverage | 84.4% | 84.4% | +0.0% |
| Files | 46 | 47 | +1 |
| Lines | 1194 | 1196 | +2 |
+ | Covered | 1008 | 1010 | +2 |
| Test Execution Time | 2s | 2s | 0s |Code coverage of files in pull request scope (81.0% → 81.1%)
Reported by octocov |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
doc/pages/auto_generate_files.md (2)
1-4: Consider Consistent Title Hyphenation.
The section title currently reads “### Auto generate files for Dependency Injection.” For consistency with the documentation link text in the index file, consider updating it to “### Auto‑generate files for Dependency Injection.”
15-17: Consider Consistent Title Hyphenation for Mocks.
In the “Mock” section header, the title “### Auto generate files for Mock” would be clearer if changed to “### Auto‑generate files for Mock” to maintain consistency with the Dependency Injection section and the index link.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~15-~15: It appears that a hyphen is missing (if ‘auto’ is not used in the context of ‘cars’).
Context: ...`` orshell make generate### Auto generate files for Mock In sqly, Mock is perfor...(AUTO_HYPHEN)
shell/usecase.go (2)
5-14: Consider adding getter methods for encapsulation.The
Usecasesstruct currently exposes its fields directly. Consider adding getter methods to better encapsulate the implementation details and provide a more stable public API.type Usecases struct { - csv usecase.CSVUsecase - tsv usecase.TSVUsecase - ltsv usecase.LTSVUsecase - json usecase.JSONUsecase - sqlite3 usecase.DatabaseUsecase - history usecase.HistoryUsecase - excel usecase.ExcelUsecase + csv usecase.CSVUsecase + tsv usecase.TSVUsecase + ltsv usecase.LTSVUsecase + json usecase.JSONUsecase + sqlite3 usecase.DatabaseUsecase + history usecase.HistoryUsecase + excel usecase.ExcelUsecase } + +func (u *Usecases) CSV() usecase.CSVUsecase { return u.csv } +func (u *Usecases) TSV() usecase.TSVUsecase { return u.tsv } +func (u *Usecases) LTSV() usecase.LTSVUsecase { return u.ltsv } +func (u *Usecases) JSON() usecase.JSONUsecase { return u.json } +func (u *Usecases) SQLite3() usecase.DatabaseUsecase { return u.sqlite3 } +func (u *Usecases) History() usecase.HistoryUsecase { return u.history } +func (u *Usecases) Excel() usecase.ExcelUsecase { return u.excel }
16-35: Consider returning a pointer to Usecases.The
NewUsecasesfunction returns a value instead of a pointer. For larger structs, returning a pointer is more efficient as it avoids copying the entire struct.-func NewUsecases( +func NewUsecases( csv usecase.CSVUsecase, tsv usecase.TSVUsecase, ltsv usecase.LTSVUsecase, json usecase.JSONUsecase, sqlite3 usecase.DatabaseUsecase, history usecase.HistoryUsecase, excel usecase.ExcelUsecase, -) Usecases { - return Usecases{ +) *Usecases { + return &Usecases{ csv: csv, tsv: tsv, ltsv: ltsv, json: json, sqlite3: sqlite3, history: history, excel: excel, } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
config/argument.go(2 hunks)di/wire_gen.go(1 hunks)doc/pages/auto_generate_files.md(1 hunks)doc/pages/markdown/index.md(1 hunks)shell/dump.go(2 hunks)shell/header.go(1 hunks)shell/import.go(3 hunks)shell/shell.go(8 hunks)shell/shell_test.go(1 hunks)shell/tables.go(1 hunks)shell/usecase.go(1 hunks)shell/wire.go(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
doc/pages/auto_generate_files.md
[uncategorized] ~15-~15: It appears that a hyphen is missing (if ‘auto’ is not used in the context of ‘cars’).
Context: ...`` or shell make generate ### Auto generate files for Mock In sqly, Mock is perfor...
(AUTO_HYPHEN)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Unit test (linux) (windows-latest, 1.22)
- GitHub Check: Unit test (linux) (windows-latest, 1.23)
- GitHub Check: Unit test (linux) (windows-latest, 1)
🔇 Additional comments (21)
doc/pages/markdown/index.md (1)
20-20: New Developer Documentation Link Added.
The new link “Auto-generate files” is correctly added in the "Document for developers" section. Ensure that the target document exists at the specified relative path.doc/pages/auto_generate_files.md (4)
5-8: Shell Command for DI Generation Verified.
The provided shell command block using “go generate ./…” is clear and follows conventional usage for initializing Dependency Injection files.
9-14: Alternative Command for DI Generation Documented.
The alternative command using “make generate” is a welcomed addition. Its presentation along with the primary command is clear and accessible.
18-22: Shell Command for Mock Generation Verified.
The shell command “go generate ./…” provided for generating mock files is standard and clear.
23-27: Alternative Command for Mock Generation Provided.
The inclusion of an alternative “make generate” command for generating mocks is appropriate and clearly documented.shell/wire.go (1)
6-10: LGTM! Clean addition to the wire set.The addition of
NewUsecasesto the wire set aligns with the refactoring goals and follows Google Wire's best practices.shell/header.go (1)
21-21: LGTM! Clean transition to usecases layer.The change correctly replaces the direct interactor usage with the new usecases layer while maintaining the existing functionality.
shell/tables.go (1)
16-16: LGTM! Clean transition to usecases layer.The change correctly replaces the direct interactor usage with the new usecases layer while maintaining the existing functionality.
shell/dump.go (2)
23-23: LGTM! Clean refactoring to use usecases layer.The change from direct interactor usage to the usecases layer improves code organization while maintaining the same functionality.
42-56: LGTM! Consistent refactoring across all output modes.The switch case cleanly handles all output modes by delegating to the appropriate usecase, with proper fallback to CSV for unsupported modes.
di/wire_gen.go (1)
56-57: LGTM! Clean dependency injection refactoring.The consolidation of individual usecases into a single object improves the code organization while maintaining the same initialization and cleanup behavior.
shell/import.go (1)
28-73: LGTM! Consistent refactoring to usecases layer.The changes maintain the same functionality while improving code organization by:
- Using appropriate usecases for each file format
- Maintaining proper error handling
- Preserving Excel sheet name handling logic
config/argument.go (2)
128-154: LGTM! Well-structured usage message.The usage function provides comprehensive help information with good organization and colored output for better readability.
156-159: LGTM! Simple and clear version output.The version function provides a clean way to display the version information.
shell/shell.go (6)
32-37: LGTM! Good refactoring to consolidate use case fields.The consolidation of multiple interactor fields into a single
usecasesfield improves code organization and aligns with the Single Responsibility Principle.
39-52: LGTM! Clean constructor implementation.The constructor signature is simplified by accepting a single
usecasesparameter, making it more maintainable.
113-114: LGTM! Proper use of the consolidated usecases field.The method correctly uses the new
usecasesfield to access the history interactor with appropriate error handling.
134-134: LGTM! Proper use of the consolidated usecases field.The method correctly uses the new
usecasesfield to access the history interactor with appropriate error handling.
202-213: LGTM! Proper use of the consolidated usecases field.The method correctly uses the new
usecasesfield to access the sqlite3 interactor with appropriate error handling.
283-287: LGTM! Proper use of the consolidated usecases field.The method correctly uses the new
usecasesfield to access the history interactor with appropriate error handling.shell/shell_test.go (1)
793-794: LGTM! Test helper properly updated to use the new Usecases type.The test helper correctly creates and uses the consolidated usecases object while maintaining proper cleanup.
Summary by CodeRabbit