Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

ADR 42: partitioned consumer groups and exclusive consumer #263

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jnmoyne
Copy link
Contributor

@jnmoyne jnmoyne commented Feb 1, 2024

Consistently hashed partitioned consumer groups (including exclusive client consumption from a durable consumer) for streams.

@jnmoyne jnmoyne force-pushed the add-partitioned-consumer-groups branch 2 times, most recently from 250d6a0 to 7588f84 Compare March 6, 2024 09:06
@jnmoyne jnmoyne changed the title ADR 41: partitioned consumer groups and exclusive consumer ADR 42: partitioned consumer groups and exclusive consumer Mar 6, 2024
@ripienaar
Copy link
Contributor

@jnmoyne can I close this one but keep the branch around for future reference, we'll refine around the new groups ADR and eventually get back to this but I imagine it would be quite a bit rewrite of this ADR then - big enough to really be new?

@jnmoyne
Copy link
Contributor Author

jnmoyne commented Jul 29, 2024

Most of this is still valid and only a small part would have to be re-written with the addition of pinned consumers.

Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Moyne <jnmoyne@gmail.com>
@jnmoyne jnmoyne force-pushed the add-partitioned-consumer-groups branch from f940a84 to 7f1a026 Compare March 2, 2025 01:53
@jnmoyne
Copy link
Contributor Author

jnmoyne commented Mar 2, 2025

Updated to the current initial implementation using the 2.11 features

@jnmoyne
Copy link
Contributor Author

jnmoyne commented Mar 2, 2025

I'll pick the next available ADR number after an LGTM

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants