Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade vitest from 2.1.5 to 2.1.8 #127

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nerdy-tech-com-gitub
Copy link
Owner

@nerdy-tech-com-gitub nerdy-tech-com-gitub commented Feb 5, 2025

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade vitest from 2.1.5 to 2.1.8.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 3 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released 2 months ago.

Issues fixed by the recommended upgrade:

Issue Score Exploit Maturity
high severity Uncontrolled resource consumption
SNYK-JS-BRACES-6838727
169 Proof of Concept
high severity Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
SNYK-JS-MICROMATCH-6838728
169 No Known Exploit
medium severity Improper Input Validation
SNYK-JS-NANOID-8492085
169 No Known Exploit
medium severity Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-JS-ROLLUP-8073097
169 Proof of Concept
medium severity Origin Validation Error
SNYK-JS-VITE-8648411
169 Proof of Concept
Release notes
Package name: vitest from vitest GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Summary by Sourcery

Upgrade Vitest from 2.1.5 to 2.1.8 to address multiple security vulnerabilities, including uncontrolled resource consumption, inefficient regular expression complexity, improper input validation, cross-site scripting (XSS), and origin validation errors.

Bug Fixes:

  • Fix uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability (SNYK-JS-BRACES-6838727).
  • Fix inefficient regular expression complexity vulnerability (SNYK-JS-MICROMATCH-6838728).
  • Fix improper input validation vulnerability (SNYK-JS-NANOID-8492085).
  • Fix cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability (SNYK-JS-ROLLUP-8073097).
  • Fix origin validation error vulnerability (SNYK-JS-VITE-8648411).

Tests:

  • Upgrade Vitest testing framework from version 2.1.5 to 2.1.8.

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade vitest from 2.1.5 to 2.1.8.

See this package in npm:
vitest

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/nerds-github/project/139aa2b5-8d12-4d85-9131-d29af301a150?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request upgrades the vitest dependency from version 2.1.5 to 2.1.8. This upgrade includes several bug fixes and performance improvements.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Upgraded the vitest dependency to address multiple vulnerabilities and incorporate bug fixes and performance enhancements.
  • Updated vitest from version 2.1.5 to 2.1.8.
cli/package.json

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:

  • It seems to have been created by a bot ('[Snyk]' found in title). We assume it knows what it's doing!
  • We don't review packaging changes - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Label error. Requires exactly 1 of: changelog:.*. Found:

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants