-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
BBM in the benchmark case #717
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
12 tasks
With the fix in PR #718 the fields look essentially the same. |
einola
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2024
# Fix a bug in BBM by adding a +1 to Pmax Fixes partially #717 ### Task List - [x] Defined the tests that specify a complete and functioning change (*It may help to create a [design specification & test specification](../../../wiki/Specification-Template)*) - [x] Implemented the source code change that satisfies the tests - [x] Documented the feature by providing worked example - [ ] Updated the README or other documentation - [x] Completed the pre-Request checklist below --- # Change Description We need to add a + 1 to the Pmax equation, because we're using the integrated stress now (so everything's multiplied with h). The correct equation is P_{max} =h [ P_0 h^f e^{-C(1-A)} ] = P_0 h^{f+1} e^{-C(1-A), which differs from equation (8) of Ólason et al. (2022) by factor h (or a +1). --- # Test Description The benchmark test case now gives more reasonable results, but more work is required. See issue #717. --- # Documentation Impact N/A --- # Other Details N/A --- ### Pre-Request Checklist - [x] The requirements of this pull request are fully captured in an issue or design specification and are linked and summarised in the description of this PR - [x] No new warnings are generated - [x] The documentation has been updated (or an issue has been created to track the corresponding change) - [x] Methods and Tests are commented such that they can be understood without having to obtain additional context - [x] This PR/Issue is labelled as a bug/feature/enhancement/breaking change - [x] File dates have been updated to reflect modification date - [x] This change conforms to the conventions described in the README
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
We need to be able to run BBM in the benchmark case, like Brodeau et al. (2024), and like we could in the modelling_paper branch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: