-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Dev -> Master for v2.3 release #273
Conversation
Correctly call MULTIQC_TSV_FROM_LIST
Small fixes to remove dummy files and params calls in nf-core/modules
Remove duplicate variants in ARTIC ONT pipeline
Add long format table to ONT output
Bump version to 2.3
|
Fixes to ivar_variants_to_vcf.py script
Pre-release bug fixes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just made some minor comments. Awesome work guys! 👏
] | ||
} | ||
|
||
withName: 'MULTIQC_TSV_FAIL_READS' { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess here is not a problem since the MULTIQC
not aliased process does indeed set the same path, but maybe it would be better to alias it to MULTIQC_MAIN
to avoid any issue?
@@ -4,139 +4,157 @@ | |||
"repos": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You will love this one 👀 , there is a new version of all these modules after this PR has been merged nf-core/modules#1261
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bah, it can wait for the next release now that we have tested everything. Didn't even see that it was merged! Thought we were still discussing it 👀
@drpatelh found this warnings when running
|
A [`nextclade dataset`](https://docs.nextstrain.org/projects/nextclade/en/latest/user/datasets.html#nextclade-datasets) feature was introduced in [Nextclade CLI v1.3.0](https://github.com/nextstrain/nextclade/releases/tag/1.3.0) that fetches input genome files such as reference sequences and trees from a central dataset repository. We have uploaded Nextclade dataset [v2022-01-18](https://github.com/nextstrain/nextclade_data/releases/tag/2022-01-24--21-27-29--UTC) to [nf-core/test-datasets](https://github.com/nf-core/test-datasets/blob/viralrecon/genome/MN908947.3/nextclade_sars-cov-2_MN908947_2022-01-18T12_00_00Z.tar.gz?raw=true), and for reproducibility, this will be used by default if you specify `--genome 'MN908947.3'` when running the pipeline. However, there are a number of ways you can use a more recent version of the dataset: | ||
|
||
* Supply your own by setting: `--nextclade_dataset <PATH_TO_DATASET>` | ||
* Let the pipeline create and use the latest version by setting: `--nextclade_dataset false --nextclade_dataset_tag false` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd suggest not including this as an option, as it allows for non-reproducibility
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have had a number of users that just want to use the latest version and this allows them to do that 🤷🏽
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤦
input_file.eachLine { line -> | ||
def val = line.split(sep)[col] | ||
if (uniqify) { | ||
if (!vals.contains(val)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would make my algorithms teacher upset, better to use a Set
in this case. Will suggest this change elsewhere
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will have to wait until the next release now! Minor change :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, no problem. There are more low hanging fruit than this for improving performance 😉
Use ft,sb filters for Fisher's exact test and strand bias
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work!
No way around this I'm afraid. It's because we initialise |
Thanks guys! |
No description provided.