-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
SIGFPE on system with zero in /cgroup/cpu/cpu.cfs_period_us #2173
Comments
bradking
pushed a commit
to bradking/ninja
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2022
This will fix the issue (ninja-build#2173).
PolynomialDivision
pushed a commit
to PolynomialDivision/ninja
that referenced
this issue
Nov 3, 2022
This will fix the issue (ninja-build#2173).
|
johanneslerch
pushed a commit
to johanneslerch/ninja
that referenced
this issue
Jun 2, 2023
This will fix the issue (ninja-build#2173). (cherry picked from commit d502d19)
johanneslerch
pushed a commit
to johanneslerch/ninja
that referenced
this issue
Jun 2, 2023
This will fix the issue (ninja-build#2173). (cherry picked from commit d502d19)
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
In the code, to calculate the cpu limit, if the value of
/cgroup/cpu/cpu.cfs_period_us
is 0, the program will generate the signal SIGFPE. Should we protect this by checking the value ofperiod.first
?code:
ninja/src/util.cc
Line 650 in d4017a2
The error information:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: