-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.7k
fs: add access() and accessSync() #114
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
For @caineio
|
Sorry, but something is not right here:
|
@cjihrig just a moment, I'll add the rest of core modules :) |
Hello! I am pleased to see your valuable contribution to this project. Would you Questions:
Please provide the answers in an ordered list like this:
Note that I am just a bot with a limited human-reply parsing abilities, In case of success I will say: In case of validation problem I will say: Truly yours, Responsibilities
|
@cjihrig should work now ;) |
For @caineio
|
...summoning the core team devs! |
fs.exists()
andfs.existsSync()
do not follow typical node conventions.fs.access()
andfs.accessSync()
are added as alternatives in this commit.This is the first part of #103. The second part is actually deprecating
exists()
andexistsSync()
. This PR is equivalent to nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#8714