Skip to content

test: add variable arguments support for Argv #12166

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

danbev
Copy link
Contributor

@danbev danbev commented Apr 2, 2017

At the moment Argv only supports three arguments which fulfilled my
requirements when working on #9163.

This commit adds support for a variable number of arguments. There is
also a no-args constructor that is the equivalent to running "node -p
process.version" which is hopefully alright as a default.

Refs: #9163

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test

At the moment Argv only supports three arguments which fulfilled my
requirements when working on nodejs#9163.

This commit adds support for a variable number of arguments. There is
also a no-args constructor that is the equivalent to running "node -p
process.version" which is hopefully alright as a default.

Refs: nodejs#9163
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Apr 2, 2017
@Trott Trott added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Apr 2, 2017
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Apr 4, 2017

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2017
At the moment Argv only supports three arguments which fulfilled my
requirements when working on #9163.

This commit adds support for a variable number of arguments. There is
also a no-args constructor that is the equivalent to running "node -p
process.version" which is hopefully alright as a default.

PR-URL: #12166
Ref: #9163
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Apr 4, 2017

Landed in 5ccaba4

@jasnell jasnell closed this Apr 4, 2017
@jasnell jasnell mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2017
@danbev danbev deleted the varargs branch April 6, 2017 05:52
@italoacasas
Copy link
Contributor

cc @danbev

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Apr 19, 2017

@italoacasas Sorry I missed this message. Would you like me to open at PR against v7.x-staging with a backport?

@gibfahn
Copy link
Member

gibfahn commented Jun 17, 2017

Should this be backported to v6.x-staging? If yes please follow the guide and raise a backport PR, if no let me know or add the dont-land-on label.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants