Skip to content

docs: Supplement docs for Writable and Transform streams #142

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vovacodes
Copy link
Contributor

Slightly fix and supplement the documentation for Writable#write and
Transform#transform methods. Make it more consistent. Mention
passing 'buffer' as an encoding param in case chunk is a Buffer.

Slightly fix and supplement the documentation for Writable#write and
Transform#transform methods. Make it more consistent. Mention
passing 'buffer' as an encoding param in case chunk is a Buffer.
@vovacodes
Copy link
Contributor Author

nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#8769 - the same changes for joyent/node

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Jan 12, 2015

I'm down with this, LGTM so I'll merge, thanks @wizardzloy and sorry for the delay

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Jan 12, 2015

nope, too far removed from the v1.x branch so it's too messy to pull this in. @wizardzloy could you please either rebase against the io.js/v1.x branch or re-submit these changes again from scratch?

piscisaureus pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2015
Slightly fix and supplement the documentation for Writable#write and
Transform#transform methods. Make it more consistent. Mention passing
'buffer' as an encoding param in case chunk is a Buffer.

PR: #142
Reviewed-by: Bert Belder <bertbelder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@piscisaureus
Copy link
Contributor

lgtm & thanks. 68a2d8f

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Jan 12, 2015

@piscisaureus how did you merge this? my git-fu is lacking and I couldn't get this to work cleanly enough to do quickly.

boingoing added a commit to boingoing/node that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2017
napi: Remove napi_set_function_name since not all engines can rename functions
eti-p-doray pushed a commit to eti-p-doray/node that referenced this pull request May 28, 2024
syg pushed a commit to syg/node that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
eti-p-doray pushed a commit to eti-p-doray/node that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
syg pushed a commit to syg/node that referenced this pull request May 5, 2025
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants