-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
doc: update author-ready label terms #23249
Conversation
Is there wording about authors who wish to land their own PRs? |
Sorry to ping @nodejs/collaborators, but it seems this is worth PSA. Does this need to be fixed or left as is? |
@refack Can you elaborate? I do not recall any rules re who can or should add the label. Do you suggest a restriction or just try to clear up the status quo? |
In the context of this PR I'm mostly asking; is there an agreed way to flag PRs that the author wished to land themselves? |
Sorry, I do not know about any such flagging( |
Given that this is collaborator's guide and the situation of author landing own PRs arises only to collaborators, that discussion (@refack 's) is most relevant here itself IMO. However, I don't see the rules, pre-conditions, authority for setting or unsetting the |
Landed in 1a18e35 |
PR-URL: nodejs#23292 Refs: nodejs#23249 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#23292 Refs: nodejs#23249 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This was briefly discussed by @addaleax and me about this and I don't think that #22255 implies this change. See https://github.com/orgs/nodejs/teams/collaborators/discussions/49?from_comment=1#discussion-49-comment-1. I would like to revert this since it makes it pretty hard to apply the label early and that is the main benefit, I personally got from it and I guess that could likely also apply to others. This label was also applied for semver-major PRs when the @nodejs/tsc LGs where still outstanding. This is another reason why this would not imply this change. |
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesIf I understand it correctly, we need this correction after #22255
cc @Trott