Skip to content

src: move InternalMakeCallback and MakeCallback into callback_scope.cc #25299

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

Since these are just wrappers on top of InternalCallbackScope, this
makes the implementations easier to find.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Jan 1, 2019
@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member Author

joyeecheung commented Jan 1, 2019

hmm, or maybe an alternative solution is to put these in an api.cc ? @addaleax But that may result in another monolithic file as well..

EDIT: or maybe a src/api/ folder would work better?

Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it’s fine this way 👍

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member Author

@joyeecheung joyeecheung added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Jan 4, 2019
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

addaleax commented Jan 7, 2019

This needs a rebase

@addaleax addaleax removed the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Jan 7, 2019
Since these are just wrappers on top of `InternalCallbackScope`, this
makes the implementations easier to find.
@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member Author

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor

danbev commented Jan 9, 2019

Landed in e54d11e.

@danbev danbev closed this Jan 9, 2019
danbev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2019
This commit moves InternalMakeCallback and MakeCallback into
callback_scope.cc. Since these are just wrappers on top of
`InternalCallbackScope`, this makes the implementations easier to find.

#25299
PR-URL: #25299
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2019
This commit moves InternalMakeCallback and MakeCallback into
callback_scope.cc. Since these are just wrappers on top of
`InternalCallbackScope`, this makes the implementations easier to find.

#25299
PR-URL: #25299
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2019
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2019
This commit moves InternalMakeCallback and MakeCallback into
callback_scope.cc. Since these are just wrappers on top of
`InternalCallbackScope`, this makes the implementations easier to find.

nodejs#25299
PR-URL: nodejs#25299
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2019
This commit moves InternalMakeCallback and MakeCallback into
callback_scope.cc. Since these are just wrappers on top of
`InternalCallbackScope`, this makes the implementations easier to find.

nodejs#25299
PR-URL: nodejs#25299
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2019
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants