Skip to content

test: remove flag for test-addon-uv-handle-leak #25327

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Jan 3, 2019

test-addon-uv-handle-leak only requires worker_threads for the
subprocess which it explicitly calls with --experimental-worker. The
main test itself does not need it. Remove Flags: comment and move
loading of worker_threads into subprocess-only logic.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

test-addon-uv-handle-leak only requires worker_threads for the
subprocess which it explicitly calls with --experimental-worker. The
main test itself does not need it. Remove Flags: comment and move
loading of worker_threads into subprocess-only logic.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Jan 3, 2019
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Jan 3, 2019

@Trott Trott added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Jan 3, 2019
Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Jan 6, 2019

Landed in 7ed790e

@Trott Trott closed this Jan 6, 2019
Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2019
test-addon-uv-handle-leak only requires worker_threads for the
subprocess which it explicitly calls with --experimental-worker. The
main test itself does not need it. Remove Flags: comment and move
loading of worker_threads into subprocess-only logic.

PR-URL: nodejs#25327
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2019
test-addon-uv-handle-leak only requires worker_threads for the
subprocess which it explicitly calls with --experimental-worker. The
main test itself does not need it. Remove Flags: comment and move
loading of worker_threads into subprocess-only logic.

PR-URL: #25327
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
refack pushed a commit to refack/node that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2019
test-addon-uv-handle-leak only requires worker_threads for the
subprocess which it explicitly calls with --experimental-worker. The
main test itself does not need it. Remove Flags: comment and move
loading of worker_threads into subprocess-only logic.

PR-URL: nodejs#25327
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2019
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2019
test-addon-uv-handle-leak only requires worker_threads for the
subprocess which it explicitly calls with --experimental-worker. The
main test itself does not need it. Remove Flags: comment and move
loading of worker_threads into subprocess-only logic.

PR-URL: nodejs#25327
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2019
@Trott Trott deleted the worker-child branch January 13, 2022 22:50
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants