crypto: add OP flag constants added in OpenSSL v1.1.1 #33929
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
c++
|
Full OpenSSL option flag list is available here: Also I have noticed that several OpenSSL constants here are missing description: I think it would be a good idea to add it, or to put a reference to the SSL wiki where the descriptions can be found, or do both. Let me know what you think. |
tniessen
reviewed
Jun 18, 2020
|
@nodejs/crypto |
jasnell
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2020
mildsunrise
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2020
tniessen
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2020
+1 on doing both |
mkrawczuk
added a commit
to mkrawczuk/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2020
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to nodejs#33929.
2 tasks
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 3, 2020
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to #33929. PR-URL: #34050 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2020
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to #33929. PR-URL: #34050 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 16, 2020
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to #33929. PR-URL: #34050 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
This PR seems to have gotten a little stuck. Is there anything that should be done to move further? |
This was referenced Aug 7, 2020
|
Landed in 3306070 |
mildsunrise
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 7, 2020
PR-URL: #33929 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
This was referenced Aug 8, 2020
addaleax
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2020
PR-URL: #33929 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
This was referenced Aug 9, 2020
Merged
This was referenced Aug 11, 2020
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2020
PR-URL: #33929 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
addaleax
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2020
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to #33929. PR-URL: #34050 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
addaleax
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2020
PR-URL: #33929 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
addaleax
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2020
PR-URL: #33929 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Merged
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes