Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

add proxy handler "has" for "http2.Http2ServerResponse.socket" and "http2.Http2ServerRequest.socket" #35197

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

masx200
Copy link
Contributor

@masx200 masx200 commented Sep 14, 2020

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

add proxy handler "has" for "http2.Http2ServerResponse.socket" and "http2.Http2ServerRequest.socket".

Usually check whether the connection is a secure connection using the following judgment method:

const request=new http2.Http2ServerRequest(stream, headers, options, rawHeaders)
//true
assert(true===request.socket.encrypted)

//false
assert("encrypted" in request.socket)

@masx200 masx200 requested review from a team as code owners September 14, 2020 22:43
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/http2
  • @nodejs/net

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the http2 Issues or PRs related to the http2 subsystem. label Sep 14, 2020
@masx200 masx200 changed the title add proxy handler "has" for http2.Http2ServerResponse.socket add proxy handler "has" for "http2.Http2ServerResponse.socket" and "http2.Http2ServerRequest.socket" Sep 14, 2020
Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please add a unit test?

@masx200
Copy link
Contributor Author

masx200 commented Sep 14, 2020

Ok, testing is in progress

@masx200
Copy link
Contributor Author

masx200 commented Sep 15, 2020

@codebytere @Trott @schamberg97 @addaleax

Request review

@masx200 masx200 requested review from mcollina and removed request for a team September 15, 2020 05:32
Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@mcollina mcollina added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 15, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 15, 2020
@rickyes
Copy link
Contributor

rickyes commented Sep 17, 2020

Can you fix the lint-js errors? it will make the review easier.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Sep 18, 2020

Can you fix the lint-js errors? it will make the review easier.

I've fixed all the lint errors in a pair of fixup commits. @rickyes PTAL

@masx200 masx200 requested a review from Trott September 18, 2020 16:45
@Trott Trott dismissed their stale review September 19, 2020 15:13

file was renamed

Trott
Trott previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2020
@Trott Trott dismissed their stale review September 19, 2020 15:16

LGTM but I'm going to defer to others on whether this is expected/idiomatic

Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Of course this is expected/idiomatic.

@@ -188,6 +188,11 @@ function resumeStream(stream) {
}

const proxySocketHandler = {
has(stream, prop) {
const ref = stream.session !== undefined ? stream.session[kSocket] : stream;
return (prop in stream) || (prop in ref);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Optional suggestion: The test file only covers one of these conditions, right? Does it make sense to add a test case so that both are covered?

@Trott Trott added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 19, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 19, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95 aduh95 added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Nov 8, 2020
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2020
PR-URL: #35197
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Nov 9, 2020

Landed in 0d2e198

@aduh95 aduh95 closed this Nov 9, 2020
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2020
PR-URL: #35197
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
@danielleadams danielleadams mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2020
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2020
PR-URL: #35197
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2020
PR-URL: #35197
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2020
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2020
PR-URL: #35197
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. http2 Issues or PRs related to the http2 subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants