-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.4k
lib: restate the code to use primordials #36552
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
dfa522c
to
07855be
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you also replace those please:
node/lib/internal/validators.js
Line 66 in f28715d
if (!octalReg.test(value)) { |
node/lib/internal/validators.js
Line 201 in f28715d
(typeof port === 'string' && port.trim().length === 0) || |
@aduh95 - yes, I modified the changes. PTAL |
Commit message should indicate where we are using more primordials. Maybe this?
|
Removed |
It looks like the benchmark is for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM if no benchmark or CI issues.
@Trott - Thanks for the review. without fully knowing it, I left the default values in jenkins interface. |
Benchmark result : https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js%20benchmark/job/benchmark-node-micro-benchmarks/782/console
is this performance result within allowable limits? |
81f7df1
to
5188055
Compare
PR-URL: nodejs#36552 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
64fbf93
to
0538749
Compare
Landed in 0538749 |
PR-URL: #36552 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes