Skip to content

doc: remove --experimental-modules documentation #38974

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed

Conversation

iam-frankqiu
Copy link
Contributor

Because ESM modules have been fully supported since 13.2.0.
So I think we should remove the experimental-modules option in case of misunderstanding.

@github-actions github-actions bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Jun 9, 2021
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Jun 9, 2021

/cc @nodejs/modules

@targos targos added the semver-major PRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version. label Jun 9, 2021
Copy link
Member

@targos targos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is way too early for this flag to be removed from node_options.cc.
Removing it only from the documentation SGTM, because it's a no-op and is not returned in node --help.

@addaleax addaleax removed the semver-major PRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version. label Oct 21, 2021
@iam-frankqiu iam-frankqiu added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Oct 21, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@jkrems jkrems left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with the "make it a noop" suggestion from @addaleax.

Copy link
Contributor

@MylesBorins MylesBorins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 for undocumented noop

@aduh95 aduh95 changed the title refactor: remove experimental-modules flag doc: remove --experimental-modules documentation Oct 23, 2021
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Oct 23, 2021

One test is failing: test-process-env-allowed-flags-are-documented

@aduh95 aduh95 added doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. and removed c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Oct 23, 2021
@iam-frankqiu iam-frankqiu force-pushed the del_experimental_modules branch from 9c2e805 to 1ba1c12 Compare October 24, 2021 04:02
@iam-frankqiu iam-frankqiu force-pushed the del_experimental_modules branch from c655a71 to 7b26d20 Compare October 27, 2021 13:59
@iam-frankqiu iam-frankqiu requested a review from targos October 27, 2021 15:10
@iam-frankqiu iam-frankqiu added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Oct 27, 2021
@targos targos self-assigned this Oct 31, 2021
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2021
PR-URL: #38974
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Jan Krems <jan.krems@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Oct 31, 2021

Landed in b63313a

@targos targos closed this Oct 31, 2021
@targos targos removed their assignment Oct 31, 2021
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2021
PR-URL: #38974
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Jan Krems <jan.krems@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2021
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2021
PR-URL: #38974
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Jan Krems <jan.krems@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Nov 26, 2021
1 task
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants