-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.6k
benchmark: fix misc/startup failure #42442
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
I would hold off on landing this because whether or not we are keeping |
Yea, I think it's probably fine to merge. Sorry for the hold up. |
for (const key of canBeRequired) { | ||
for (let key of canBeRequired) { | ||
if (modulesNeedingPrefix.includes(key)) | ||
key = `node:${key}`; | ||
require(key); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any reason not to use the prefix for all modules?
require(key); | |
require(`node:${key}`); |
Closing because #42746 has landed, and fixes the issue. Please re-open if I'm mistaken. |
Fixes: #42437
It's not the ideal fix as it's duplicating a list/Set that already exists in the internals but 🤷♂️