-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.6k
[v16.x backport] test: improve code coverage for streams/duplexify #42788
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
[v16.x backport] test: improve code coverage for streams/duplexify #42788
Conversation
Fast-track has been requested by @danielleadams. Please 👍 to approve. |
is anything missing to approve on this PR? |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
@nodejs/collaborators would anyone else be able to review this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
@ErickWendel I just realized the base of this PR is pointed to |
Oh. I'm sorry about it. I'll do. This week is being crazy here but I'll trying doing it by the weekend |
hey just a heads up. I'm back from vacations so I'll be working on this feature this week o/ |
7fd01a6
to
9bd0c30
Compare
9bd0c30
to
5bedc83
Compare
Ready to go now 🤩 |
bd952ea
to
01e7d1f
Compare
5bedc83
to
e8d4384
Compare
Thank you @ErickWendel. Landed in 4aa4f7c |
PR-URL: nodejs/node#41862 Backport-PR-URL: nodejs/node#42788 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <soyjuanarbol@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Backport of #41862
/cc @danielleadams