Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

websocket: don't use pooled buffer in mask pool #3357

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 23, 2024

Conversation

tsctx
Copy link
Member

@tsctx tsctx commented Jun 22, 2024

@tsctx tsctx requested a review from mcollina June 22, 2024 07:08
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ try {
function generateMask () {
if (bufIdx === BUFFER_SIZE) {
bufIdx = 0
crypto.randomFillSync((buffer ??= Buffer.allocUnsafe(BUFFER_SIZE)), 0, BUFFER_SIZE)
crypto.randomFillSync((buffer ??= Buffer.allocUnsafeSlow(BUFFER_SIZE)), 0, BUFFER_SIZE)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No problem, but with the current code, I have some concerns.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see them, unless we acess buffer.buffer anywhere

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If they access it, they can rewrite the mask, right?

Copy link
Member Author

@tsctx tsctx Jun 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

example:

import { WebSocket } from './index.js'

Buffer.poolSize = 16386 * 4

// any echo server url
const u = new WebSocket('ws://localhost:3000')

u.onmessage = (data) => {
  // The mask can be rewritten here.
  new Uint8Array(Buffer.allocUnsafe(1).buffer).fill(0)
  u.send('Hi')
}
u.onopen = () => {
  u.send('Hi')
}

Copy link
Member

@KhafraDev KhafraDev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible to add a test?

@tsctx
Copy link
Member Author

tsctx commented Jun 22, 2024

Unfortunately, I can write a test, but this can't catch using pooled buffer completely.

@KhafraDev
Copy link
Member

better something than nothing

@tsctx
Copy link
Member Author

tsctx commented Jun 22, 2024

test was placed incorrectly. this can catch it until now!

@ronag ronag merged commit 27b2589 into nodejs:main Jun 23, 2024
31 checks passed
@tsctx tsctx deleted the websocket/donot-use-pooled-buffer branch June 23, 2024 07:06
ronag added a commit to nxtedition/undici that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
* upstream/main:
  fix: use explicit flag for when use has interacted with stream (nodejs#3361)
  refactor: simplify signal handling (nodejs#3362)
  fix: consider bytes read when dumping (nodejs#3360)
  websocket: don't use pooled buffer in mask pool (nodejs#3357)
  Revert "fix: post request signal (nodejs#3354)" (nodejs#3359)
  fix: post request signal (nodejs#3354)
  build(deps): bump node from `075a5cc` to `9af472b` in /build (nodejs#3355)
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2024
This was referenced Dec 16, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants