-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Fix description and tests for inherent_method_must_use_added #677
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very nice, thank you! 🚀
I really appreciate your work on improving the lints! I'd love to merge any more improvements you find. If you might be interested in some opportunities for improvement deeper than the lints themselves, I'd be happy to suggest some ideas as well.
From my understanding, by default, associated fn of a type means the ones within inherent impl. |
Honestly, I am really itching to revamp the whole test system so that it can be used to auto-generate documentation. But I have been holding back because I know it needs to be discussed first. |
I'm not sure — and even if that is the case, it's best to err on the side of clarity. It's better to avoid causing misunderstandings than to be technically correct while confusing users.
Neat! I agree it could be better, in a variety of ways. Would you care to open an issue and write down your thoughts on it? I'd love to hear what you'd change, how you'd change it, and what auto-generated documentation would be created as a result! I'm particularly curious about:
Another key thing I strongly care about is making sure to keep the |
Fixes #674