-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
CLI: implement 'openio-admin <item_type> locate' commands #1704
Conversation
bd4b083
to
10a4cd5
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1704 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 79.58%
=========================================
Files ? 370
Lines ? 68486
Branches ? 6880
=========================================
Hits ? 54500
Misses ? 13880
Partials ? 106 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
14eb3da
to
6aa513d
Compare
575ebeb
to
a0d662f
Compare
a0d662f
to
6a4b3be
Compare
A command to display which service is in charge of hosting an item. | ||
""" | ||
|
||
columns = ('Type', 'Item', 'Service Id', 'Addr', 'Location', 'Status') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could add Volume
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could replace Status
with 2 columns (Up
and Score
)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What would we display in the Volume
column?
I don't like the idea of splitting Status
: currently it displays either the status (in the form of a boolean and a score) or the error that occurred during the check. Where would we display the error then?
6a4b3be
to
bcb3713
Compare
SUMMARY
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
SDS VERSION