Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Feat/rao devnet ready #869

Draft
wants to merge 165 commits into
base: devnet-ready
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Feat/rao devnet ready #869

wants to merge 165 commits into from

Conversation

gztensor
Copy link
Contributor

@gztensor gztensor commented Oct 24, 2024

Description

Stabilized rao. Includes rao branch changes and devnet-ready changes intelligently merged together.

Also, there are a few functional changes:

  • Move stake by amount
  • Enforce rate limits in moving stake
  • Tempos are all made to be 300
  • Remove conviction based subnet ownership added in rao

Related Issue(s)

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update
  • Other (please describe):

Breaking Change

See rao documentation

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have run cargo fmt and cargo clippy to ensure my code is formatted and linted correctly
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Screenshots (if applicable)

n/a

Additional Notes

n/a

@gztensor gztensor requested a review from sam0x17 October 25, 2024 04:11
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants