add yurtappset v1beta1 proposal

[luc99hen]

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespace from that line:
/kind bug
/kind documentation
/kind enhancement
/kind good-first-issue
/kind feature
/kind question
/kind design
/sig ai
/sig iot
/sig network
/sig storage

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

other Note

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (67e1485) 52.20% compared to head (dadfdae) 52.18%.
Report is 10 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1890      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   52.20%   52.18%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         172      172              
  Lines       20844    20882      +38     
==========================================
+ Hits        10881    10898      +17     
- Misses       8999     9017      +18     
- Partials      964      967       +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	52.18% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[luc99hen]

24.1.10 Community Discussion Results:

1. Before using YurtAppSet, when creating node pools, it is recommended that users plan node pool labels in advance to facilitate subsequent node pool management. @gnunu
2. Is it better to introduce a new CRD rather than upgrading YurtAppSet? @Congrool

• Pros: no need to care about YurtAppSet v1alpha1 dependencies
• Cons: need to propose a new CRD name

[rambohe-ch]

@luc99hen @gnunu @Congrool I want to add conclusions that we had made on the meeting for these two points.

24.1.10 Community Discussion Results:

1. Before using YurtAppSet, when creating node pools, it is recommended that users plan node pool labels in advance to facilitate subsequent node pool management. @gnunu

A common label will be added to nodepool in the webhook when new nodepool is created, so end user can use this common label to select all nodepools in the YurtAppSet without managing the labels of nodepool.

2. Is it better to introduce a new CRD rather than upgrading YurtAppSet? @Congrool

• Pros: no need to care about YurtAppSet v1alpha1 dependencies
• Cons: need to propose a new CRD name

because YurtAppSet v1beta1 can keep part consistency with YurtAppSet v1alpha1, at the same time, YurtAppSet will cover the feature of YurtAppDamon and YurtAppOverrider. I don't import a new CRD for the YurtAppSet v1beta1.

[rambohe-ch]

/lgtm