Skip to content

fix: a GVKP with no plural should be equivalent to the same GVK #2731

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2025

Conversation

metacosm
Copy link
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun claprun@redhat.com

@metacosm metacosm self-assigned this Mar 11, 2025
@metacosm metacosm requested review from csviri and xstefank March 11, 2025 09:46
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 11, 2025
Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <claprun@redhat.com>
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 11, 2025
@csviri csviri merged commit 4ae9361 into main Mar 12, 2025
20 checks passed
@csviri csviri deleted the gvk-equals branch March 12, 2025 09:14
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants