-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 139
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
video_volume.js
will keep all the players volume in sync
#166
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
this will also save the video player volume between sessions
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@ version: '3' | |||
services: | |||
web: | |||
container_name: proxitok-web | |||
image: ghcr.io/pablouser1/proxitok:master |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You should let docker-compose use the pre-built image, maybe you were doing some testing and forgot to undo it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Obviously, how else could I test? It's just Github automatically picking up the docker-compose
changes, this wasn't meant to make it in the PR
@@ -22,8 +25,8 @@ services: | |||
- proxitok | |||
security_opt: | |||
- no-new-privileges:true | |||
cap_drop: | |||
- ALL | |||
#cap_drop: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are you commenting out this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was breaking the Apache container previously. Again, the docker-compose.yml
wasn't meant to be included in the PR.
Ok, make a commit undoing those temporary changes and I'll merge. |
this will also save the video player volume between sessions
It's entirely possible that there's a better place somewhere else to include the script, but I'm not sure what's a better choice.