-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
feat: Add TLS support to gnet #435
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
2. change the gnet API name for the TLS server & client 3. gnet TLS write returns the exact number of bytes written to the socket rather than the lenght of data.
to MsgBuffer so that the tls conn not longer holds the actual buffer when the connection is idle. Other updates: 1. add defaultSize in MsgBuffer 2. fix the condition to clean up the buffer (i > blockSize to i >= blockSize)
1. The kernel TLS implementation is based on https://github.com/jim3ma/go.git branch: dev.ktls.1.16.3 2. Supports: TLS1.2 & TLS 1.3 3. Supported cipher suites: AES_128_GCM_SHA256 AES_256_GCM_SHA384 CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 4. Server side has been tested and it works. Client side needs to be tested later 5. TODO: add sendfile(), TLS_TX_ZEROCOPY_RO (device offload), and TLS_RX_EXPECT_NO_PAD. (See https://docs.kernel.org/networking/tls.html#optional-optimizations) for details.
but not tested yet
data should use the local declaration rather than re-declaring in the if statement, which results len(data) is 0 on line 794, resulting EOF.
======================================= 1. disable kTLS 1.3 RX on kernel 5.15 2. check zero copy on kernel 5.19 3. check tls 1.3 no pad on kernel 6.0
====================================== 1. TLS writes the data into the socket directly rather than writing the data into the buffer. the data is buffered only if error unix.EAGAIN occurs. 2. Add "tlsEnabled bool" to control when to use tlsconn.Write(). The reason is that tlsconn.Write() encrypt the data, then calls gnetConn.Write() which could potently call either gnetConn.write() or gnetConn.writeTLS(). Therefore, we make "tlsEnabled" to false before calling tlsconn.Write(), and then restore "tlsEnabled" to true after that. 3. tlsconn.flush() calls gnetConn.Flush() to flush the buffer immediately. Therefore, we don't need to call gnetConn.Flush() in gnet TLS handshake phase as tlsconn.Handshake() calls gnetConn.Flush() implicitly.
Thank you for implementing TLS and opening this PR. This might cost me a lot of time to absorb and review the code, but I'll do this as fast as possible. |
======================================== Redesign the buffer in gnet TLS implementation to achieve zero-copy. Background: - tlsconn.rawInput: raw input from TCP to hold the TLS record - tlsconn.input: buffer to hold decrypted TLS record - tlsconn.hand: buffer to hold handshake data - tlsconn.sendBuf: buffer to hold sending data Problems: - Memory copy in TLS read: In the previous implementation, tlsconn.input refers to the gnetConn.inboundBuffer. To decrypted, we copy el.buffer to tlsconn.rawInput. The TLS connection, write the decrypted data to tlsconn.input, which is gnetConn.inboundBuffer. When el.eventHandler.OnTraffic() is triggered, gnetConn.Next() and gnet.Conn.Peek() can trigger more data copy as it can write to c.loop.cache() - Memory copy in TLS write: In the previous implementation, all encrypted data are first written to tlsconn.sendBuf, which refers to gnetConn.outboundBuffer. Then, tlsconn.Write() calls gnetConn.Write() which flushes the buffer to the socket New implementation: We designed LazyBuffer (lb) which has a buf []byte and its reference ref *[]byte. In the lazy mode, lb.ref is always nil, lb.buf is readonly. When calling lb.Write(), lb request a buffer from the sync.Pool, and copies lb.buf to the new buffer. Both lb.buf and lb.ref point to the new buffer. - New TLS read: With LazyBuffer, we let tlsconn.rawInput refer to el.buffer. Decrypted data stores in tlsconn.rawInput as well. tlsconn.Data() returns the reference of all decrypted data, and will be assigned to gnetConn.buffer. - New TLS write: tlsconn.Write() first encrypts the data, then calls gnetConn.WriteTCP() which directly writes the data to the socket. - New TLS handshake: we restore the tlsconn.Buffering flag which is only used in the handshake. Incoming handshake data is stored in tlsconn.hand and will be discarded immediately after being used. Outgoing handshake data is buffered in tlsconn.sendBuf, and will be flushed after calling tlsconn.flush() which calls gnetConn.WriteTCP() which directly writes the data to the socket.
I optimized the memory copy and buffer usage for TLS read, write, and handshake. The following briefly describes the implementation idea which would be helpful to review the code Buffers used in TLS
TLS handshake (starts in
|
Message marshalling makes use of BytesOrPanic a lot, under the assumption that it will never panic. This assumption was incorrect, and specifically crafted handshakes could trigger panics. Rather than just surgically replacing the usages of BytesOrPanic in paths that could panic, replace all usages of it with proper error returns in case there are other ways of triggering panics which we didn't find. In one specific case, the tree routed by expandLabel, we replace the usage of BytesOrPanic, but retain a panic. This function already explicitly panicked elsewhere, and returning an error from it becomes rather painful because it requires changing a large number of APIs. The marshalling is unlikely to ever panic, as the inputs are all either fixed length, or already limited to the sizes required. If it were to panic, it'd likely only be during development. A close inspection shows no paths for a user to cause a panic currently. This patches ends up being rather large, since it requires routing errors back through functions which previously had no error returns. Where possible I've tried to use helpers that reduce the verbosity of frequently repeated stanzas, and to make the diffs as minimal as possible. Thanks to Marten Seemann for reporting this issue. Updates #58001 Fixes #58359 Fixes CVE-2022-41724 Change-Id: Ieb55867ef0a3e1e867b33f09421932510cb58851 Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1679436 Reviewed-by: Julie Qiu <julieqiu@google.com> TryBot-Result: Security TryBots <security-trybots@go-security-trybots.iam.gserviceaccount.com> Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <bracewell@google.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com> (cherry picked from commit 1d4e6ca9454f6cf81d30c5361146fb5988f1b5f6) Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1728205 Reviewed-by: Tatiana Bradley <tatianabradley@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/468121 Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com> Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com> TryBot-Bypass: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com> Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
@panjf2000 请问gnet何时可以支持TLS |
fa1dc24
to
5d1cf9e
Compare
This PR is marked as stale because it has been open for 21 days with no activity. You should take one of the following actions:
This PR will be automatically closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. |
This PR is marked as stale because it has been open for 21 days with no activity. You should take one of the following actions:
This PR will be automatically closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. |
1. Are you opening this pull request for bug-fixes, optimizations or new feature?
new feature
2. Please describe how these code changes achieve your intention.
This PR is to add the TLS support to get.
Change of the source code
pkg/tls/
internal/boring
is the dummy package forboring TLS
as it is required by the standard Golang TLS libraryacceptor.go
,connection.go
, andeventloop.go
. Basically, once the TLS enabled on the server side,it will call
gnetConn.UpgradeTLS()
to upgrade the protocol to TLS. Then, all reads and writes will go to thegnetConn.readTLS()
andgnetConn.writeTLS()
The gnet TLS implementation
crypto/ecdh
incrypto/tls/key_agreement.go
, which is not available ingo <= 1.19
,go.mod
is bumped up to1.20
.kernel >= 5.19
, and no pad is enabled onkernel >= 6.0
.Examples
An example of using gnet TLS can found at https://github.com/0-haha/gnet_tls_examples. You should be able to run the repo in docker.
Other Comments
I would say the majority of the implementation has been completed. Open to ongoing conversations.
中文可以聊。
3. Please link to the relevant issues (if any).
Fixes #16
4. Which documentation changes (if any) need to be made/updated because of this PR?
The
gnet.Run
command will accept thetls.Config
like this:4. Checklist