add scrutinizer ci support #124
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@julianseeger am I missing anything here? |
|
Erm nope, I think this PR is fine but #123 which I recently merged has broken the tests on the master for hhvm. I couldn't reproduce the failure yet but it must be either fixed or reverted before anything else is merged into the master (like this PR). |
julianseeger
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2014
add scrutinizer ci support
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds support for scrutinizer-ci to paratest. Opts for php_cpd over scrutinizer's php_sim. I have noticed that cpd is more mature and sane about what is considered duplicated code, especially when it comes to things like __call and __get.
Any future tweaks to what we want to track can be added to .scrutinizer.yml
fixes #120