pcli: add delegate-many transaction command reading from a CSV file #5002
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Example CSV file: ``` penumbravalid10n2srs5257a6nxq9x3fhcsqyc0wh8q2lp7f80qd7wlmzdm6znypse23mmh,0.123 penumbravalid1aglayhqq2ec5yfgx8ljqrd9ypnma5uu46hsd0d77dakgu4nywuyqk29d0m,0.201 penumbravalid1lr6rqawqmwetsr8dvdefrpeh7zuamj2ka9jgmesn2xxfgf49hsys79rz9j,0.256 ``` Transaction: f7d386906f5fabc88a5eb051d31bfd45cb51049a7f92f231ed33be3ef6314151
erwanor
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2025
5 tasks
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your changes
Adds a
pcli tx delegate-manycommand that allows delegations based on a CSV file.Example CSV file:
Transaction: f7d386906f5fabc88a5eb051d31bfd45cb51049a7f92f231ed33be3ef6314151
Checklist before requesting a review
I have added guiding text to explain how a reviewer should test these changes.
If this code contains consensus-breaking changes, I have added the "consensus-breaking" label. Otherwise, I declare my belief that there are not consensus-breaking changes, for the following reason: