add pmd

[harriscw]

For this check I'm adding PMD as a response indicating PD. This indicates progressive metabolic disease, a response evaluated by PET-CT.

[sarabodach]

Hi @harriscw ,

Thanks for adding in heme-related items!

Can you please add the following:

• New tests from the header copied as unit tests so that there is 100% coverage
• Include header and/or unit tests with a few additional scenarios: if RSEVAL is available but not populated with a value, --DTC is not populated, if patient has assessments reported on the same date but at different visits (and set A has no issue, but set B has an issue)
• Reference to this update and link to this PR in NEWS.md
• More in the header @description about inclusion of PMD for heme (basically the note that you had added to this PR) and any other considerations

A few general questions--

• Should TUMETHOD be considered for a PMD response? What about a qualifier for PMD when RSCAT (if populated) does not include the string "RECIST 1.1"?
• Can RS.VISIT be considered an optional variable and, if populated, included in the returned dataframe? The eCRF may have separate visit-based folders, so referencing the visit name will make querying easier - especially if the discrepant data are in an Unscheduled visit folder.
• Is there any need to include RSCAT/RSSCAT as a returned variable?
• Should sdtmchecksmeta have an additional note about this heme scenario?
• Should the return message differentiate the PMD scenario from the PD scenario?

Thanks!

Sara

[sarabodach]

Thank you for making this update. Comments here, but something needed to get added to this box...

[harriscw]

Things I didn't do:

• Reference to this update and link to this PR in NEWS.md

Would have to rebase, will do in a separate PR

• Should TUMETHOD be considered for a PMD response? What about a qualifier for PMD when RSCAT (if populated) does not include the string "RECIST 1.1"?
• Is there any need to include RSCAT/RSSCAT as a returned variable?

I dont think these are necessary