Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

annotation rule does not detect violations when array-syntax annotations are on the same line as other annotations #1765

Closed
shashachu opened this issue Jan 4, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1766

Comments

@shashachu
Copy link
Contributor

shashachu commented Jan 4, 2023

Steps to Reproduce

@[JvmStatic Provides] @Foo
fun foo() = 42

is correctly reformatted to

@[JvmStatic Provides]
@Foo
fun foo() = 42

in IJ, but the annotation rule doesn't detect any violations.

Your Environment

  • Version of ktlint used: 0.48.1
shashachu added a commit to shashachu/ktlint that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2023
It seemed simplest to always force `@[...]` annotations onto separate lines.
shashachu added a commit to shashachu/ktlint that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2023
It seemed simplest to always force `@[...]` annotations onto separate lines.
shashachu added a commit to shashachu/ktlint that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2023
It seemed simplest to always force `@[...]` annotations onto separate lines.
shashachu added a commit to shashachu/ktlint that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2023
It seemed simplest to always force `@[...]` annotations onto separate lines.
shashachu added a commit to shashachu/ktlint that referenced this issue Jan 5, 2023
It seemed simplest to always force `@[...]` annotations onto separate lines.
@paul-dingemans paul-dingemans added this to the 0.49.0 milestone Jan 5, 2023
@paul-dingemans paul-dingemans modified the milestones: 0.49.0, 0.48.2 Jan 15, 2023
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants