Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Improve parsing logic around << #662

Merged
merged 31 commits into from
Jul 13, 2023

Conversation

anupam-tiwari
Copy link

@anupam-tiwari anupam-tiwari commented Jun 24, 2023

Describe your changes

Issue number

Closes #610

Checklist before requesting a review

  • Performed a self-review of my code
  • Formatted my code with pkgmt format
  • Added tests (when necessary).

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://jupysql--662.org.readthedocs.build/en/662/

@anupam-tiwari
Copy link
Author

@edublancas can you please check if this error has occurred before!

@edublancas
Copy link

@anupam-tiwari: yeah, this is the tcl problem I mentioned in the morning meeting. I re-ran the CI, let's see if it passes now. next time the CI fails unexpectedly, check the logs. if you find references to tcl, push an empty commit to re-trigger the CI

Copy link

@edublancas edublancas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we're no longer using the ready-for-review tag, please request a review using the github panel on the top right (or tag me)

@anupam-tiwari
Copy link
Author

anupam-tiwari commented Jun 30, 2023

@edublancas can you please review this one!

Copy link

@yafimvo yafimvo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. Added minor comments.

Copy link

@edublancas edublancas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please merge conflicts and request a new review when ready

@anupam-tiwari
Copy link
Author

@edublancas does this look good?

@edublancas edublancas requested review from yafimvo and neelasha23 July 11, 2023 04:28
Copy link

@yafimvo yafimvo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it looks good. Please address @neelasha23 notes and I think we can merge.

@neelasha23
Copy link

Looks good!

Copy link

@edublancas edublancas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@anupam-tiwari make sure tests pass

@edublancas edublancas merged commit 6d60df9 into ploomber:master Jul 13, 2023
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

improving << parsing logic
4 participants