Removing outdated reference to NYC masterclass #164
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
thanks @ravintpillai ! |
HammadTheOne
pushed a commit
to HammadTheOne/dash
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2021
…iptic-6.5.3 Bump elliptic from 6.4.1 to 6.5.3
HammadTheOne
pushed a commit
to HammadTheOne/dash
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2021
Sorting sorts ascending first and displays correct icon
HammadTheOne
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2021
Sorting sorts ascending first and displays correct icon
HammadTheOne
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2021
…6.5.3 Bump elliptic from 6.4.1 to 6.5.3
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now that the masterclass has been and gone, I'm suggesting removing the reference to it from the README (I got confused and tried to # because I didn't read the dates on the link in the README carefully enough).